面對不同執政黨的中央政府及較高素質的公民,台北市政府所面對的預算不足及民眾需求高漲的雙重困境,較國內其他各級政府更鉅,故除了引進內部績效管理制度變革外,更具策略性的改革方向,則是著重不同機制問功能的重新調整,將傳統上屬於公部門的服務,透過外包及競標,轉由公司或非營利組織來提供,此即本研究探討市府「促進民間參與公共建設」政策的原因。 本研究發現市府卅餘年的促參政策有政策創新、官僚慣性、集中特定模式、結合企業與非營利組織等特色,另外,透過公共選擇理論的分析,市府未來在實施「促進民間參與公共建設法」時,可能遭遇議會衝突、形式化評估、代理人問題、監督不足等問題。
Because Taipei city government gets fewer and fewer budget and faces higher and higher citizen's demand at the same time, it had changed internal performance system. Moreover, Taipei city government is focusing more on transacting function between government and private organization (including firms and non-profit organization). That's why our article here will discuss the policy of Taipei city government's private participation in public infrastructure. In this article, we find Taipei city government has developed many strategies in dealing with private participation policy, such as policy innovation, bureaucratic inertia, focusing on some specific models, and combining profit and non-profit organization. Furthermore, by public choice theory lens, we forecast Taipei city government might encounter city councilor's confliction, apparent evaluation, Agent problem and locking supervision.