社會福利機構之天然災害風險追蹤分析

本研究旨在提出老人福利機構及身心障礙福利機構這兩類社會福利機構之天然災害風險分析方法，並依此方法比較其2011年（第一期）與2017年（第二期）之風險變化。本研究提出二步驟災害風險分析方法，第一步利用危害、暴露與環境脆弱度作為地震、坡地災害與水災風險分級的依據，第二步再依據分級結果，檢視中高風險機構的社會脆弱度，並提出策略分析建議。研究發現，無論是地震災害風險、坡地災害風險，抑或是水災風險，老人福利機構與身心障礙福利機構，第二期屬於高風險的機構，比率皆較第一期低；社會脆弱度部分，則以「是否有規劃機構外收容地點」此一問題，第二期較第一期，有規劃者比率明顯提高，亦即相關脆弱度有明顯之下降。本研究提供之機構災害風險分析方法及面向，可作為擬定提升機構災害管理能力及策略之參考依據；在不同時間點，利用此方法進行調查並比較結果，亦可瞭解相關政策之成效。

關鍵字

老人福利機構；身心障礙福利機構；災害風險；脆弱度

並列摘要

This study aims to propose a natural disaster risk analysis method for two types of social welfare institutions: welfare institutions for the elderly and the disabled, and to compare their risk changes in 2011 and 2017 according to this method. This study uses a two-step disaster risk analysis method. The first step is to take hazards, exposure and environmental vulnerability as the basis for earthquake, slopeland disaster and flood risk classification. In the second step, based on the classification results, it examines the social vulnerability of medium and high risk institutions, and offers strategic suggestions. Whether it is earthquake disaster risk, slopeland disaster risk, or flood risk, the ratio of welfare institutions for the elderly and disabled which were classified as high risk in 2017 is lower than in 2011. As for the social vulnerability, compared with 2011, more institutions had shelter plans in 2017, which means the related vulnerability decreased significantly. The methods and aspects of institutional disaster risk analysis provided by this study can be used as a reference for formulating and improving institutional disaster management capabilities and strategies. Besides, using this method to conduct surveys and compare results at different times can also provide insights into the effectiveness of relevant policies.

並列關鍵字

welfare institutions for the elderly ； welfare institutions for the disabled ； disaster risk ； vulnerability

參考文獻

李欣輯、楊惠萱（2012）。〈坡地災害社會脆弱度指標評估與應用〉，《都市與計劃》，39(4)，375-406。https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.39.4.375 【Li, H.-C., & Yang, H.-H. (2012). Assessing and applying social vulnerability index of slope-land disasters (SVIoL). City and Planning, 39(4), 375-406. https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.39.4.375】

李欣輯、楊惠萱、廖楷民、蕭代基（2009）。〈水災社會脆弱性指標之建立〉，《建築與規劃學報》，10(3)，163-182。https://doi.org/10.30054/JAP.200912.0001 【Li, H.-C., Yang, H.-H., Liao, K.-M., & Shaw, D.-G. (2009). Constructing social vulnerability index of flood disaster. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 10(3), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.30054/JAP.200912.0001】

張芝瑄、盧鏡臣（2018 年 11 月）。〈近期老人福利機構水災應變作為之分析〉，「臺灣災害管理研討會」，新北市。https://doi.org/10.6857/CDMT.201811.0001 【Chang, C.-H., & Lu, J.-C. (2018, November). Flood responses of senior citizens’ welfare institutions in Taiwan in 2010s. Paper presented at the Conference for Disaster Management in Taiwan, New Taipei, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.6857/CDMT.201811.0001】

曹鼎志、許文科、賴承農、鄭錦桐、張玉粦、陳振宇、羅文俊（2010）。〈土石流風險分析之建構與應用〉，《中興工程季刊》，109，41-52。https://doi.org/10.30154/SE.201010.0005 【Tsao, T.-C., Hsu, W.-K., Lai, C.-N., Cheng, C.-T., Chang, Y.-L., Chen, C.-Y., & Lo, W.-C. (2010). Construction and application of risk analysis of landslide flow. Sinotech Engineering, 109, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.30154/SE.201010.0005】

陳瑞玲、吳杰穎、林文苑、林建宏（2014）。〈都市洪災脆弱度因子與都市規劃防範策略之探討〉，《建築學報》，89，75-92。https://doi.org/10.3966/101632122014090089005 【Chen, C.-J., Wu, J.-Y., Lin, W.-Y., & Lin, J.-H. (2014). Urban flood vulnerability factors and the strategies for urban planning. Journal of Architecture, 89, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.3966/101632122014090089005】

國際替代計量

社會福利機構之天然災害風險追蹤分析

全文下載

主題瀏覽