透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.40.207
  • 期刊

社區醫療群家庭醫師對全民健保家庭醫師整合性照護試辦計畫政策滿意度調查

Survey of Primary Care Physicians Opinions of the National Health Insurance Family Doctors Integrated Health Delivery System

摘要


The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of primary care physicians participating in the Family Doctors Integrated Delivery System for the previous three years. A structured questionnaire was mailed to 1,546 attending physicians from October to December, 2005. A total of 448 replied, with a response rate of 29.0%. Statistical analysis, including univariate analysis, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0. More than half (56.1%) of the primary care physicians participating in the Family Doctors Integrated Delivery System were satisfied with the plan. The respondents' highest satisfaction points were related to improvement of the doctor-patient relationship (70.1 points), quality of care (68.6 points), and professional ability (67.9 points). The respondents felt more dissatisfied with issues of increase in personal income (48.6 points), improvement of life quality (50.4 points), and payment from the National Health Insurance (53.6 points). After adjustment for gender, professional specialty, and duration of participation in the plan, older physicians had 1.04 times (95% C.I.=1.01-1.07) higher satisfaction. Areas of physician practice in the northern, middle and southern parts of Taiwan also had 9.98 (95% C.I.=1.19-83.74), 9.87 (95% C.I.=1.16-84.1), 9.45 (95% C.I.=1.12-80.04) times higher satisfaction than in the eastern part, respectively. Family physicians had higher satisfaction rates than other specialties (p<0.05) related to quality of patient care, promotion of professional performance, increase of patient respect, and increase in personal income. Our study showed high satisfaction rates among primary care physicians participating in the Family Doctors Integrated Delivery System, especially in the dimension of improving quality of health care. It is also important to provide primary care physicians adequate financial compensation and better life quality to assure quality medical care delivery.

關鍵字

無資料

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of primary care physicians participating in the Family Doctors Integrated Delivery System for the previous three years. A structured questionnaire was mailed to 1,546 attending physicians from October to December, 2005. A total of 448 replied, with a response rate of 29.0%. Statistical analysis, including univariate analysis, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0. More than half (56.1%) of the primary care physicians participating in the Family Doctors Integrated Delivery System were satisfied with the plan. The respondents' highest satisfaction points were related to improvement of the doctor-patient relationship (70.1 points), quality of care (68.6 points), and professional ability (67.9 points). The respondents felt more dissatisfied with issues of increase in personal income (48.6 points), improvement of life quality (50.4 points), and payment from the National Health Insurance (53.6 points). After adjustment for gender, professional specialty, and duration of participation in the plan, older physicians had 1.04 times (95% C.I.=1.01-1.07) higher satisfaction. Areas of physician practice in the northern, middle and southern parts of Taiwan also had 9.98 (95% C.I.=1.19-83.74), 9.87 (95% C.I.=1.16-84.1), 9.45 (95% C.I.=1.12-80.04) times higher satisfaction than in the eastern part, respectively. Family physicians had higher satisfaction rates than other specialties (p<0.05) related to quality of patient care, promotion of professional performance, increase of patient respect, and increase in personal income. Our study showed high satisfaction rates among primary care physicians participating in the Family Doctors Integrated Delivery System, especially in the dimension of improving quality of health care. It is also important to provide primary care physicians adequate financial compensation and better life quality to assure quality medical care delivery.

參考文獻


Starfield B,Hoekelman RA,McCormick M(1984).Who provides health care to children and adolescents in the united states?.Pediatrics.74,991-997.

被引用紀錄


徐嘉婕(2017)。全民健康保險家庭醫師整合性照護計畫與照護連續性對照護結果之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701475
潘芷昕(2014)。家庭醫師整合性照護計畫對醫療照護利用與結果之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02186
葉德豐(2008)。醫療群與非醫療群病人對基層醫療照護品質與家醫計畫之評價---階層線性模式之應用〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.02582
林彩鳳(2010)。兒科病患家屬對家庭醫師制度的認知與態度之研究〔碩士論文,中臺科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0099-1908201114062012

延伸閱讀