並列摘要
In Taiwan, it is not necessary for the policyholder to make an application for endorsement or consent to change of beneficiary from insurers. The Supreme Court has opinions that the change of beneficiary is valid, when insurers receive the notice of change of beneficiary in writing before the assured die. Under Japanese Insurance Act, the beneficiary change will be effective retroactive to the time that the policyholder sent the application of beneficiary change. In U. S. A., the court will hold that the change of beneficiary is effective if policyholder does everything possible to comply with the beneficiary change procedure set forth in the policy but has failed because of circumstances beyond her control. Therefore, this article offers some suggestions and recommends that the ”Life Insurance Model Policy” should be revised.
延伸閱讀
- 陳俊元（2020）。論保險經紀人之義務：受託義務與我國保險法修正之再檢討。臺大法學論叢，49(2)，559-634。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202006_49(2).0003
- 張淑芬、王鈺涵（2015）。發布「保險業辦理不動產投資有關即時利用並有收益之認定標準及處理原則」之令釋。理律法律雜誌（中文），2015(12)，11-11。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110408001-201512-201601040008-201601040008-11-11
- 張淑芬、楊淑妃（2013）。「保險業辦理不動產投資有關即時利用並有收益之認定標準及處理原則」再度修正。理律法律雜誌（中文），2013(1)，26-27。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110408001-201301-201302210010-201302210010-26-27
- Tsai, R. S. (2002). Court Must Inform Applicable Law before Judgement. 理律法律雜誌（英文）, 2002(2), 17-17-1. https://doi.org/10.29492/LLB.200203.0015
- 楊宏暉（2016）。On Construction of Obligation to Re-Negotiate when Circumstances Change。臺北大學法學論叢，(97)，1-78。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16815939-201603-201604200032-201604200032-1-78