對「空」之闡述的探索－論《不真空》之評破即色宗

Explore the Method to Establish 'Sunyata' - On the Criticism upon the School of Jise (Matter-as-Such) in the "Treatise on the Unreal-Void"

趙悠(You Zhao) ； 陳帥(Shuai Chen)

《新世紀宗教研究》 11卷1期 (2012/09) Pp. 105-127

摘要

僧肇在《不真空論》裡對「即色者」的批評，一直備受爭議。本文在仔細閱讀了各類古代注疏並參考現代論著之後，試圖對「即色者」的歸屬、僧肇批評的具體所指以及僧肇本身的立場等問題給出自己的判斷。僧肇所謂的即色者雖然與其宗師支道林並不完全相符，但對後者的批評仍然出之有因。筆者認為，在理解僧肇對即色宗批評的意思之外，還可以從對「空」的表述上看兩者的差異，進而觀察印度佛典在中國流傳的進程。

關鍵字

不真空論 ； 即色宗 ； 支道林 ； 色空關係

並列摘要

In ”The Treatise on the Unreal-Void” by Seng-Chao, there's a criticism on the School of Jise (Matter-as-Such), which bears a long-term argument. By observing the ancient commentary books available, with modern researches relevant, here we try to response to three crucial questions: the one 'Jise' indicates, the reason why Seng-Chao criticized on him, and Seng-Chao's standpoint from which he debates. The criticism doesn't identify well with Zhi Daolin, though Seng-Chao's words make sense to a great extent, which is worth our understanding. Meanwhile, by the sight of an observer, their difference results from that they don't share the same way to prove the core-conception Sunyata, which may contribute to the different background of the spread of Indian Buddhist texts at that early time.

並列關鍵字

"The Treatise on the Unreal-Void" ； The Schhol of Jise (Matter-as-such) ； Zhi Daolin ； the Relationship between Rupa and Sunyata (Matter and Void)

參考文獻

東漢･支婁迦讖譯，《道行般若經》，《大正藏》冊8，第224號。

晉･僧肇，《肇論》，《大正新修大藏經》冊45，第1858號，東京：大正一切經刊行會，1924。

(2006)。卐續藏經。石家莊:河北省佛教協會虛雲印經功德藏。

晉･無羅叉、竺叔蘭譯，《放光般若經》，《大正藏》冊8，第221號。

晉･僧肇，《注〈維摩詰經〉》，《大正藏》，冊38，第1775號。