當代文學史料存在方式及其相關問題的思考

On the Existence Way and Related Issues of Contemporary Literature Historical Materials

吳秀明(Xiu-Ming Wu)

《中國現代文學》 29期 (2016/06) Pp. 13-23

摘要

由於歷史和現實諸多因素的影響，中國當代文學長期以來盛行的是「以論代史」的研究理路，輕史料重闡釋成為主導這個學科的基本取向。然而，作為文學演進的生命軌跡和印記，當代文學史料不會也不可能因此而消匿，而是以自己獨特的方式存在和發展著。當代文學史料工作啟動較晚，與古代文學和現代文學史料研究相比，也處於明顯的滯後狀態，但為了學術創新和學科發展，我們應該將其提到「戰略」的高度加以認識和重視。而在當下，最重要的也許就是將史料工作由一般的「編纂」向「研究」推進，並注意「事實」與「思想」、「歷史化」與「當代性」之間的融會貫通。

關鍵字

當代文學 ； 文學史料 ； 存在方式 ； 問題思考

並列摘要

By reason of the influence of many historical and practical elements, Chinese Contemporary Literature Research is filled with the logic of 'replacing history with theory'. Preferring Hermeneutic to historical materials is becoming the dominant trend of this subject. However, as the orbit and imprint of literature's evolution, Contemporary Literature Historical Materials cannot and is impossible to fade away because of that, but it always existing and developing on its unique way. The working about the historical materials of Chinese Contemporary Literature Research started late, and is lagging behind comparing to ancient and modern literature. For the innovation and development of the subject, we should elevate it to the height of 'strategy'. In present, the most important issue might be developing the working of historical materials from common 'compilation' to further 'research'. Meanwhile, we should pay enough attention to the integration between 'facts' and 'thoughts', and also between 'historicization' and 'contemporaneity'.

並列關鍵字

contemporary literature ； historical materials of literature ； existing mode ； problem thinking

參考文獻

(2006)。文學評論‧編後記。文學評論。2006(6)

王瑤(1980)。關於中國現代文學研究工作的隨想。中國現代文學研究叢刊。1980(4)

王鍾翰()。

中共中央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局編譯(1972)。馬克思恩格斯選集。北京:人民出版社。

朱金順(1986)。新文學資料引論。北京:北京語言學院出版社。