透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.218.254
  • 期刊

政治學方法論偏頗發展的檢討

Reflections on the Biased Development in Political Methodology

摘要


本文首先借重H. R. Alker在一九九年政治學新手冊中的文章,指陳政治學方法論得了「身心悖離的躁鬱症」,使政治學術的主題性和主體性變得偏狹而晦暗不明。基於此種反省,本文追溯Donald Moon在一九七五政治學手冊的一篇長文,主張自然科學方法論和詮釋學方法論的辯證合一。這原是一項很好的主張,可惜Moon未能徹底到底,也未曾獲得後續性的討論。Moon本人對科學解釋功能和演繹邏輯有強烈的偏好,此一傾向倒在理性抉擇學派中得到充分的發揚。所幸從一九九○年代中期之後,美國政治學內部產生許多重要反省,使政治學的辯證發展有進一步向前推動的契機。

並列摘要


This article is to discuss the biased development in the methodology of political science. First, we will examine H. R. Alker's criticism on ”the inauthenticity malaise in political methodology,” which have made the discipline lost its main theme and subjectivity. In line with these reflections, we will trace back to Donald Moon's 1975 article, which claimed the synthesis between scientific methodology and modern hermeneutics. Moon gave a right direction but did not carry it out. Since the mid 1990s, anyhow, political scientists have initiated a new wave of reflections on the defects of political methodology. It may create a new process of synthesis.

參考文獻


石之瑜 Shih, Chih-Yu(2001)。做為藝術的政治學-兼評建構主義的科學哲學立場 Politics is an Art: A Critical Response to the Ontological Hypocrisy of Constructivism。美歐季刊 Americas & Europe Quarterly。15(2)
吳玉山 Wu, Yu-Shan(2000)。邁入二十一世紀的政治學。臺北:中國政治學會。
袁易 Yuan, I(2001)。對於Alexander Wendt有關國家身份與利益分析之批判:以國際防擴散建制為例 A Critique of Alexander Wendt's Analysis of Identities and Interests of States: The Case of International Nonproliferation Regimes。美歐季刊 Americas & Europe Quarterly。15(2)
袁頌西 Yuan, Song-Shi(1981)。當代政治學中的解釋問題:實徵論與銓釋派之論爭。政治學報 Chinese Political Science Review。9
徐振國 Hsu, Chen-Kuo(2000)。從威權論統合論到新國家論的轉折和檢討 Theoretical Reflections on the Transition from Authoritarianism and Corporatism to Neo-statism。理論與政策 Theory and Policy。14(2)

被引用紀錄


邱頌恩(2009)。擺脫科學與哲學的擄掠:由輝格觀點看研究方法論〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02644
張珍立(2005)。批判實存論對當代政治學研究之啟發〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.00994

延伸閱讀