透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.61.223
  • 期刊

政治言論自由與社會正義-羅爾斯的觀點

Freedom of Political Speech and Social Justice: John Rawls's Perspective

摘要


在一個民主社會中,言論及出版自由是憲法所保障的基本權利。但是對於政治言論自由,究竟哪些才是此類言論最關鍵的課題?以及對這類言論的規範該如何拿捏才算合理適當?都是各國憲政史上一個爭議不斷的課題。羅爾斯不同於早先的Meiklejohn從「自治」的立論出發,轉從社會正義的視角切入,為此類言論提供一個更合理堅實的基礎。本文主旨即在闡述羅爾斯對於政治言論自由的立場和觀點。

並列摘要


In a democratic society, freedom of speech and press are baste rights protected by constitution. Yet what kind of freedom of speech are indispensable and indispensable and what are the proper principles of limits on it are enduring issues in the history of constitutional theories and practices. While Meiklejohn based his defense of freedom of political speech on the doctrine of ”self-government”, John Rawls tried to do the same job from another way, namely, his theory of justice. This essay is meant to be an explication and analysis of his views and theory which ground his defense of freedom of political speech.

參考文獻


Rawls, John(1971).(A Theory of Justice).
Kalven, Harry Jr.(1988).(A Worthy Tradition: Freedom of Speech in America).
Blasi, Vincent(1977).The Checking Value of First Amendment Theory.American Bar Foundarion Research Journal.2,521-649.
Choper J. H.,Fallon, R. H. Jr.,Kamisar, Y.,Shiffrin, S. H(2001).(Constitutional Law 9th ed.).
Rawls, John,S. M. Mcmurrin(1999).(Law of Peoples).

被引用紀錄


謝棋楠(2019)。中國差齡退休立法的制度性憲法性別平等缺位:以美國法院審查性別分類立法經驗分析科學與人文研究7(1),78-90。https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH.201911_7(1).0004
謝佳穎(2014)。明顯而立即危險原則之回顧與前瞻〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.01550
劉建佑(2005)。戰後台灣言論叛亂除罪化的確立〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.10459

延伸閱讀