本文探討之核心為國際人權條約之內容及國內法化之方式與範圍,而研究方法則是經由比較法之分析尋求台灣將國際人權條約國內法化之較佳途徑。 本文主要分為三個部分,首先論述國際人權條約之內容。其次,以憲法角度,分析各國將國際人權條約入憲之方式及內涵,最後國內法之析論側重於各國如何以人權法案實踐國際人權條約。 本文針對台灣之情形提出建議,我們建議之憲法增修條文為:「一、本憲法所保障之基本權利及自由,應符合世界人權宣言及國際人權條約之規範。二、世界人權宣言及經立法院議決之國際人權條約有國內法之地位,國內法與世界人權宣言及國際人權條約衝突時,國內法應符合世界人權宣言及國際人權條約之規範。三、為實踐國際人權條約及憲法所保障之權利及自由,應設立獨立行使職權之國家人權委員會。」而在人權法案部分,本文亦針對法律位階、適用範圍、引進條約範圍、政府各機關適用範圍等提出建議。
This essay's analyses focus on the approach and sphere of incorporating international human rights norms. Its research method is, by comparative law analysis, trying to find better ways for Taiwan's incorporating international human rights norms. This essay includes three main parts. The first part briefly introduces the contexts of and requirements for participating in international human rights treaties including universal and regional ones. The other two parts review comparative experience from constitutional and domestic laws dimensions. Constitutional analyses review how and what to incorporate human rights norms into constitutions, and domestic law dimension considers human rights acts in several nations. Responding to Taiwan's situation this essay offers a provision of constitutional amendment. It further proposes several points that should be emphasized while enacting a human rights act.