透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.96.159
  • 期刊

「預期媒體影響的影響力」之反制反動員效果:第三人效果與選舉行為

Antidemobilizing Effect of the Influence of Presumed Media Influence: Third-Person Effect and Voting Behavior

摘要


本研究以2011年邱毅、陳致中的「世紀辯論會」為例,探討反動員及第三人效果對選民的影響。以多層集群方式募集的701位年輕選民,在隨機分派方式下,分別觀看「世紀辯論會」或控制影片。分析結果顯示,「世紀辯論會」會導致選民對政治不信任、對政治漠不關心及政治效能感的低落,進而降低其投票意願,並使其評估「世紀辯論會」對其他選民的影響大於對自己的影響,此反動員及第三人效果同時會影響選民規範媒體的意願及其選舉行為。

並列摘要


This study investigated the demobilizing and third-person effects of the 2011 Debate of the Century between Chou and Chen on the intention of young voters to censor media and their willingness to vote. Participants (n = 701) were randomly assigned to either the experimental group to watch the Debate of the Century or the control group to watch a control film. The videos were equal in length. Results of statistical analysis indicate that the Debate of the Century tended to induce voter distrust, political apathy, and low political efficacy, thereby reducing voters' willingness to vote. Additionally, the participants perceived that the impact of the Debate of the Century was greater on other voters than on themselves. The demobilizing and third-person effects not only influence the intention of voters to censor media but also their voting behavior.

參考文獻


中時民調中心(2011.12.21)。〈毅中各表的辯論〉,《中國時報》,A15 版
王志堅(2011.12.13)。〈邱陳辯論敲定 13 日晚高市議會登場〉,《今日新聞網》,上網日期:2012 年12 月13 日,取自http://www.nownews.com/2011/12/13/301-2766025.htm
王健壯(2011.12.11)。〈一場鬧劇的意外收穫〉,《聯合報》,A15 版
林素真(2009)。總統大選公民辯論會之第三人效果。新聞學研究。101,45-8。
胡宗鳳(2011.12.13)。〈爆料天王PK 復仇王子 邱毅陳致中今晚辯論〉,《聯合報》,A4 版

被引用紀錄


辛宜珊(2018)。澎湖博弈公投的第三人效果研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2018.00009

延伸閱讀