透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

憲法與社會的互動-憲政主義之哲學分析

The Interaction between the Constitution and Society: A Philosophical Analysis of Modern Western Constitutionalism

摘要


本文以法哲學、法理學、法社會學、法律思想史的角度來討論近百年來西方民主政治基礎的憲政主義,認為憲政主義為立憲政府依法行政,落實憲法的目標、精神、條文,與法治而保障人民的基本權利,實行社會的福祉。在理論上探討憲法與社會各部門(sectors; segments, subsystems, all works of social life)之關聯;在實踐上企圖解決人民的權利(特別是自由、平等、安全)與政府的廉能(有為、有守、效率)之問的矛盾。全文分別析述霍布斯、洛克、孟德斯鳩、盧梭、康得、黑格爾、馬克思、韋伯、舒密特、海耶克、帕森思和哈伯瑪斯等人有關憲法與社會各部門之辯證、互動,以及西洋各大思想家對憲政主義的看法。

並列摘要


This essay deals with modern constitutionalism as the main cornerstone of Western liberal democracy. It explicates the ideas of the leading political and legal thinkers since the disintegration of European feudalism. In terms of the fundamental approaches of the philosophy of law, jurisprudence, legal sociology and the history of legal-political theory, the article traces out the ingenuous perspectives and innovative views of major social and political theorists, including Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Weber, Schmitt, Hayek, Parsons and Habermas. They not only touch upon the basic spirit of the existing and ideal constitution, but also discuss its relations with various sectors of society which it represents and reflects on. The treatise concludes that the Western constitutionalism embodies the vital life of the society in which it is deeply embedded.

參考文獻


洪鎌德(1997)。馬克思。臺北:東大圖書公司。
洪鎌德(1998)。從韋伯看馬克思:當代兩位思想家的對壘。臺北:揚智。
洪鎌德(2000)。人的解放-廿一世紀馬克思學說新探。臺北:揚智。
洪鎌德(2002)。自由主義。臺北:一橋。
洪鎌德、章國鋒譯、哈伯瑪斯、哈勒原著(2003)。作爲未來的過去。台北:先覺出版社。

被引用紀錄


蔡姍伶(2015)。德國極右主義之發展與因應〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.01011
高雪琴(2006)。從比例原則論即時強制的界限〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.01022

延伸閱讀