透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.81.240
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

原住民族財產權之發展─以美洲人權法院Awas Tingni案為初始的思考

Reconceptualizing Indigenous Property Rights

摘要


國際原住民族權利發展上的一項顯著匯流,在於原住民族對其土地與自然資源權利之守護者角色,獲得國際法上的承認與支持。本文以美洲人權法院審理Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua乙案為例出發,從國際司法實務上探究原住民族藉由參與國際人權規範監測組織,具體陳述並論證殖民主義擴張的原住民族史觀,試圖在國際法制的架構內重行闡釋原住民族生存與發展的基本人權內涵,結合美洲人權系統與其他國際人權系統對於財產權論證的闡釋,探究國際法上論證原住民族財產權的發展,希冀啟發對於國內現行法制下的原住民族土地及自然資源之財產權內容的發想。

並列摘要


Indigenous human rights as a fast-growing right thesis and principal subject within the modern international legal framework, surely offers a unique opportunity for the world indigenous peoples to participate at international institutionalized and substantialized the development of human rights regime. This paper studies the OAS's human rights protection system and focuses on the Inter-American Court of Human Right's case on the Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua. By exploring international judicial practice and its relationship with indigenous peoples rights articulation on indigenous historiography of colonial expansion, this paper attempts to re-expound and re-conceptualize the theory of indigenous fundamental rights of survival and development within the international legal framework. Through incorporating OAS human rights system and other international human rights schemes on the demonstration of property rights, this paper argues the idea of indigenous properly is originated from traditional laws and cultural norms and their sacred connection to the land worldview. From the standpoint of comparative laws, it would offer a new property paradigm for the Taiwanese administration, legislation and justice departments to envisage the further examination on indigenous properly issues within the existing framework.

參考文獻


中華人權協會(2010)。人權法典。社團法人中華人權協會=Chinese Assosication for Human Rights。
立法院(2005)。〈原住民族基本法〉,《立法院法律系統》,立法院國會圖書館。http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw?@170:1804289383:f:NO%3DE01212*%20OR%20NO%3DB01212$$10$$$NO-PD=Legislative Yuan [2005]. “The Indigenous Peoples Basic Law.” Official Database of the Laws.Parliamentary Library, Legislative Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C. http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw?@170:1804289383:f:NO%3DE01212*%20OR%20NO%3DB01212$$10$$$NO-PD
行政院原住民族委員會(2007)。聯合國原住民族權利宣言。臺北=Taipei:行政院原住民族委員會=Council of Indigenous Peoples, Executive Yuan。
吳豪人、黃居正(2006)。對市民財產制度的再檢視─由司馬庫斯部落公約到自然資源的歸屬。臺灣國際法季刊。3(1),207-263。
李明峻、武田美紀子(2004)。聯合國與國際人權保障─以世界規模增進全體人類之人權及基本自由之尊重。臺灣國際法季刊。1(1),101-127。

被引用紀錄


許怡心(2015)。為什麼參與了沒感覺? 台東大竹永久屋建築文化語彙重現及部落參與之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.00447
賴俊兆(2014)。原住民族教育權利的憲法建構〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02289
李明芝(2013)。原住民採取森林產物的文化困境與除罪化研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01520
林佳陵(2012)。原住民族神聖文化之法律化及其內涵〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10228
蔡志偉/Awi Mona(2022)。從「王光祿釋憲案」論原住民族狩獵文化權利的憲法保障臺大法學論叢51(3),685-755。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202209_51(3).0003

延伸閱讀