書評：當政治不再變遷，法律動員如何可能？

李立如、黃國昌（2016）。〈建置臺灣法實證研究資料庫第二期實施計畫—臺灣法律與社會變遷調查計畫（公共版）（C00220）〉。《中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫》。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=970. (Li-ju Lee, Kuo-chang Huang [2016]. The Establishment of the Taiwan Database for Empirical Legal Studies: Phase II-Unveiling the Interaction between Law and Social Change in Taiwan (Public Access Data) (C00220). Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica. https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=970.)

Google Scholar

劉恆妏（2019）。〈戰後台灣的「黨化司法」〉。《中研院法學期刊》，第 24 卷，第 1 期，頁1-86。(Heng-wen Liu [2019]. “The Politicization of the Judiciary in Post-War Taiwan.” Academia Sinica Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1:1-86.)

Google Scholar

Chang, Wen-chen (2011). “Public Interest Litigation in Taiwan: Strategy for Law and Policy Changes in the Course of Democratization.” In Po Jen Yap and Holning Lau (eds.), Public Interest Litigation in Asia (pp.136). Oxon: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom (2007). “Law and the Liberal Transformation of the Northeast Asian Legal Complex in Korea and Taiwan.” In Terence C. Halliday, Malcolm M. Feeley, and Lucien Karpik (eds.), Fighting for Political Freedom (pp. 43, 50-62). Portland: Hart Publishing.

Google Scholar

Moustafa, Tamir and Tom Ginsburg (2009). “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa (eds.), Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (pp.1, 4-11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

國際替代計量

書評：當政治不再變遷，法律動員如何可能？

全文下載

主題瀏覽

書評：當政治不再變遷，法律動員如何可能？

Book Review: How Social Movement Could be Possible without Political Change

參考文獻

延伸閱讀

國際替代計量

本網站使用Cookies