方玉潤《詩經原始》詮釋觀及其相關問題探析－以十五〈國風〉詩旨為例

Study on Fang YuRun, 《SHI-JING Original》: It's Explanation and the Other Problems

簡澤峰(Ze-Feng Jian)

《白沙人文社會學報》 3期 (2004/10) Pp. 189-213

https://doi.org/10.6766/JPHSS.200410.0189

摘要

近人研究方玉潤《詩經原始》一書多注重其以文學的角度解釋《詩經》，對《詩》旨的解說，有許多獨到特別之處。但諸家對於所謂「以文學的角度詮釋《詩經》」這一詮釋方式並沒有審慎的考察，筆者以爲「詮釋方法」的界定應該有二，包括了詮釋的立場（態度）與實際的解釋操作方式。方玉潤在解釋三百篇時就有這種明顯的區別，文學的角度是他在詮釋三百篇時，實際操作的方式；經學家的教化觀點是他詮釋背後的基本立場，不可將二者混淆。由此也可以說明，爲何方玉潤雖然多處從文學的觀點解釋三百篇，但是最後所得出的結論卻往往逃不出傳統儒家詩教意味。

關鍵字

詩經原始 ； 詮釋方法

並列摘要

Most of the researching in book ＜＜SHI-JING original＞＞-Yu-Run Fang are focus on it's literature explanations ＜＜ SHI-JING＞＞, the descriptions are unique for ＜＜POEM＞＞. But people don't think it well considered on it's literature explanation, 1 think there are 2 ways to separate the ”method of explanation”. Including the explanation attitude and actual explanation. You can tell the difference in Yu-Run Fang's explanations of ”3 hundred poems”. in his point of view, he explain literature by actual explanation. All he stands are based on the view of scholars. Both of them should not be mixed up. That is why Yu-Run Fang explains ”3 hundred poem” by many views of literature. But still can find a way out by escaping traditional Confucianism theory.

並列關鍵字

SHI-JING Original ； method of explanation