透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.7.73
  • 期刊

SAS取向諮商督導能力評量表之編製研究

The Development of a SAS-oriented Supervisory Competence Scale

摘要


本研究旨在以系統取向督導模式(SAS)為架構,編製一具有信效度及常模之「諮商督導能力評量表」。本研究以學校單位及社會輔導機構之諮商督導人員為對象,預試樣本一三一人,正式施測樣本一九五人。研究工具有研究者自編之「諮商督導能力評量表」,以及王文秀等人(2002)編製之「諮商督導專業知覺調查表」。本研究資料分別以項目分析、積差相關分析、結構方程模式之驗證性因素分析等方式來進行資料處理。 本研究結果如下: 1.完成諮商督導能力評量表之編製:計78題,三個分量表分別為「督導關係分量表」21題,「督導功能與任務分量表」31題,「督導情境脈絡分量表」26題。 2.本量表內部一致性α係數的分析,各分量表α值介於.96至.97,總量表α值為.99,顯示本量表具有極佳的內部一致性信度。其次,本量表之重到信度介於.66至.69之間,顯示本量表在時間的穩定性尚佳。 3.量表效度考驗:1.與內容有關的效度證據,本量表題目之編擬係依據相關文獻探討及專家學者的審查;2.與效標有關的效度證據,本量表之各分量表與「諮商督導專業知覺調查表」各分量表相關係數介於.73至.80,顯示本量表具有不錯之效標關聯效度。3.與建構有關的效度證據,本研究以驗證性因素分析來考驗諮商督導能力評量表的因素結構,其結果支持原研究構念。 4.建立量表常模:本量表建立原始分數的百分等級常模,以及督導關係、督導功能與任務、督導情境脈絡等三個分量表的百分等級常模。 本研究根據研究結果提出數項具體的建議,供諮商輔導機構及其人員參考。

並列摘要


The research aims to develop a supervisory competence scale based on Systems Approach to Supervision (SAS). The participants were supervisors working in schools or social counseling agencies. The pilot sample consisted of 131 supervisors and the formal investigation sample, 195 supervisors. The instruments used were the Supervisory Competence Scale (SCS) developed by the researcher and the Supervisory Perception Inventory by Wang, Shyu and Lian (2002) The data collected were analyzed through item analysis, product-moment correlation, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results are as follows: 1. The final version of the SCS consists of 78 items, divided into three subscales, with 21 items in Supervisory Relationship, 31 items in Supervisory Functions and Tasks, and 26 items in Supervisory Context. 2. The reliability coefficients of the three sub scales have yielded Cronbach α coefficients ranging from .96 to .97, with that of total SCS being .99. The test-retest reliability coefficients range from .66 to .69, indicating substantial stability. 3. Test of validity: a) Content validity--all the items have been developed out of related literature and reviewed by scholars and experts in the field of supervision. b) Criterion validity--The coefficients of the three subscales and those of the supervisory Perception Inventory range from .73 to .80, indicating criterion validity. c) Construct validity--Confirmatory factor analysis has been used in the study to test the factor structure of the Competence Scale. The result supports the original research construct. 4. The norm of the percentile rank for the Competence Scale has been constructed based on the raw score; so have the norms for the three subscales. Based on the findings, suggestions are offered for reference for counseling agencies and people working in related fields.

參考文獻


Alonzo, A.(1983).A developmental theory of psychodynamic supervision.Clinical Supervisor.1(3),23-26.
Anderson, S.(2000).Family therapy trainees' evaluations of their best and worst supervision experiences.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.26(1),79-91.
Arcinue, F.(2002).The development and validation of the Group Supervision.
Arkowitz, S. W.(2001).The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist's learning experience.Northvale, NJ:Jason Aronson.
Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural models.Academic of Marketing Science.16,74-94.

被引用紀錄


陳思帆、徐西森、連廷嘉(2023)。受督導者督導情境焦慮量表之編製研究教育心理學報54(3),537-562。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202303_54(3).0002
林家興、林旻沛、黃佩娟、胡薇瑄、江信男(2015)。心理師能力評量表之編製及其信效度分析教育心理學報47(1),63-86。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20141008
洪素宜(2010)。生命線志工督導員服務學習歷程之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315200093
王麗雯(2012)。旅遊中餐飲體驗阻礙量表之建構〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315313017
彭淑婷(2012)。國民中學輔導教師督導員訓練方案之成效評估〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315280406

延伸閱讀