透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.64.132
  • 期刊

論非給付類型不當得利-以所有人被竊盜物之添附爲例

Research on the Type of Non-payment of Unjustified Enrichment-In Case of the Accession with the Stolen Goods of the Owner

摘要


本文之內容主要在說明,當一物同時涉及到所有權之保護、盜贓物善意取得之限制與添附制度時,法律上較妥當解決爭議之思維方式。其次,對於盜贓物添附制度之規範上,詳述受有損害之人依關於不當得利之規定請求價額償還之性質。最後,在現今之不當得利制度中,本文認為對於輔助性理論之適用應予以內容上之限制或為實質權利差異之解釋,方有助於達到理論妥當適用之結果。

並列摘要


How to legal settle when a property involed protection of property right, the acquisition in good faith of thievery and accession. And regarding the accession with the stolen goods, this article will explain the nature that loss of rights holders can use unjustified enrichment to request the damages. Finally, regarding the modern unjustified enrichment, this article thinks the supporting theory, it should be limited in content or explained the difference of the substantive rights to help to attain the result of the appropriate use of theory.

參考文獻


王澤鑑(2002)。民法物權第一冊,通則、所有權。臺北:三民書局。
王澤鑑(2010)。民法物權。臺北:王慕華。
王澤鑑(2003)。不當得利。臺北:王澤鑑。
王澤鑑(1997)。民法物權第二冊,占有。臺北:三民書局。
林誠二(2000)。民法債編總論:體系化解說上冊。臺北:瑞興圖書股份有限公司。

被引用紀錄


陳政熙(2013)。不再「不當得利」-獲利返還責任之再建構〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1408201319084100

延伸閱讀