從罪刑法定原則析論中國傳統法制－以唐律為例

Analysis of Traditional Chinese Legal System from the Principle of Punishment According to Law: Use Tang Law as Example

林冠毅(Guan-Yi Lin)

《中正大學法學集刊》 46期 (2015/01) Pp. 163-214

摘要

「罪刑法定原則」公認乃源自啟蒙時代之產物，乃為近代重要之刑法原則，亦是一個憲政層次的憲法原則。而罪刑法定原則的具體內涵，是由禁止類推適用、禁止習慣法、禁止溯及既往以及要求明確性四個派生原則所構築而成。另揆諸中國傳統法制，唐律可謂集大成者，後世乃至於明清，其法律雖有所增修，然整體架構仍大致依照唐律而為發展，故本文探討中國傳統法制主要引唐律為研究對象。而對於中國傳統法制中是否具有罪刑法定原則，本文擬從罪刑法定原則之概念、淵源以及發展，進而將其與唐律之相關規範做比較，探討中國傳統法制與近代罪刑法定原則之相似與差異之處，並試圖探討中國傳統法制為何在封建制度下，會出現有類似於罪刑法定原則之規範及原因。

關鍵字

罪刑法定原則 ； 啟蒙時代 ； 禁止類推適用 ； 禁止習慣法 ； 禁止溯及既往 ； 法律明確性 ； 中國傳統法制 ； 唐律 ； 儒家化 ； 禮教精神

並列摘要

＂The principle of punishment according to law＂ is derived from the product of the Age of Enlightenment recognized, the importance of the principles of criminal law is for the modern times, is also a constitutional level of constitutional principles. The content of The principle of punishment according to law is applicable by prohibition analogy, prohibiting customary law, prohibiting ex post facto law and Clarity of law. On the other hand, traditional Chinese legal system, can be described as a master of the Tang law, later even the Ming and Qing Dynasties, despite the Upgrading its laws, then the overall structure remains substantially to the development of a quasi-Tang law and therefore in this paper discusses the major traditional Chinese Tang law cited for the study. For the Chinese traditional legal system whether the principle of punishment according to law, and the concept of the principle of punishment according to law in this paper both conclude its origin and development. And thus it is with the relevant norms of the Tang law of comparison, explored traditional Chinese legal system and Modern crime and similar legal principles of the difference between and tries to explore why traditional Chinese legal system under the feudal system, there will be legal norms and the principle of punishment according to law have similar reasons.

並列關鍵字

The Principle of Punishment According to Law ； The Age of Enlightenment ； Prohibition Analogy ； Prohibiting Customary Law ； Prohibiting ex Post Facto law ； Clarity of Law ； Chinese Traditional Legal System ； Tang Law ； Confucianization ； The Spirit of Rites

參考文獻

唐長孫無忌(1996)。唐律疏議。臺灣商務印書館。

Wieacker, Franze、陳愛娥譯、黃建輝譯(2004)。近代私法史。五南。

吳庚、陳淳文(2013)。憲法理論與政府體制。自版。

李惠宗(2009)。憲法要義。元照。

李惠宗(2010)。行政法要義。元照。