Derrida and the Problem of Ethics

Shyh-Jen Fuh

《Concentric： Literary and Cultural Studies》 29卷1期 (2003/01) Pp. 1-22

https://doi.org/10.6240/concentric.lit.200301_29(1).0001

並列摘要

An increasing number of literary critics and theorists have come to investigate Derrida's contribution to ethics in recent years. This trend both challenges an earlier tendency to attack Derrida for being ethically irrelevant and complicates the discussion of the relationship between deconstruction and ethics. In response to the on-going debates over the ethical significance of Derrida's works, this paper attempts to trace the relationship between Levinas and Derrida with regard to the thinking or problematizing of ethics: while Levinas foregrounds ethics as ”first philosophy,” seeing the ethical relation as a fundamental openness to the other that precedes subjective being, Derrida-seeing deconstructive ”reading” as an opening out of the text (of ”writing”)-is aware of the danger (and perhaps impossibility) of clearly ”naming” that which is ”ethics” (or ”ethical”), as well as the need to be open to its ”possibilities.” My contention then is that, if Levinas's ethics involves moving beyond the totality of being to the infinity of otherness, deconstruction is simultaneously ethical and non-ethical, exceeding incessantly the boundary of the ethical.

並列關鍵字

Derrida ； Levinas ； ethics ； deconstruction ； reading and writing ； the ethical relation ； responsibility ； intersubjective violence