透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.113.188

並列摘要


In this paper, I will first explore the chiasmus relation between violence and metaphysics in the thought of Levinas and Derrida. Then, I will move to examine ”the aporia of justice” in Derrida's reinterpretation of Benjamin's critique of violence with respect to law-making and law-preserving. Finally, by problematizing the aporia of deconstruction, I will attempt to provide a critique of Derrida's ”Plato's Pharmacy” in order to place Derrida's ethical account of deconstruction under erasure. My core contention is: if deconstruction is, as Derrida claims, ethical and just, it must be unethical and unjust in the first place in what he calls an ”economy of violence.” Violence per se lies at the heart of both deconstructive justice and injustice. Yet, to achieve the former, the latter paradoxically must be accomplished first-a betrayal which functions as the condition of possibility and thus of impossibility of deconstructive justice-thereby making the very moment of deconstructive decision an anxious and painful experience of aporia, or in Kierkegaard's phrase, ”a moment of madness.”

並列關鍵字

violence justice deconstruction aporia Derrida Levinas Benjamin the Other ontology ethics

參考文獻


Arrigo, Bruce A.,Christopher R. Williams(2000).Impossibility of Democratic Justice and the `Gift` of the Majority: On Derrida, Deconstruction, and the Search for Equality.Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice.16(3),321-343.
Atterton, Peter(1992).Levinas and the Language of Peace.Philosophy Today.36(1),59-70.
Barthes, Roland,R. Miller(1975).The Pleasure of the Text.New York:Hill and Wang.
Beardsworth, Richard(1996).Derrida and the Political.London and New York:Routledge.
Beardsworth, Richard,Simon Critchley(1991).Re-Reading Levinas.Bloomington and Indianapolis:Indiana UP.

延伸閱讀