並列摘要
Neuroscientific challenges to free will work on at least three levels: there is a metaphysical level, an epistemological level, and an empirical level. In this paper I discuss the main neuroscientific challenges on each of these three levels. Three fundamental conditions for free will can also be placed on these levels, and I briefly discuss how these conditions can be met in the context of the neuroscientific challenges. In conclusion I strongly doubt that neuroscientific evidence can show free will not to exist at all.
延伸閱讀
- 吳建昌（2018）。Moral Responsibility, Free Will and Neuroscience: A Pragmatism Perspective。生命教育研究，10(2)，57-100。https://doi.org/10.3966/207466012018121002005
- Conway, M. (2022). Exploring the Links between Neuroscience and Foresight. Journal of Futures Studies, 26(4), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.202206_26(4).0003
- 李瑞全（2021）。Moral Self-cultivation, Mind-related Reality and Teachings of Moral Enlightenment。鵝湖月刊，(552)，38-54。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18133738-202106-202107200017-202107200017-38-54
- Bernard Feltz、陳文祥（2008）。Neurosciences and the Reductionist Issue。哲學與文化，35(6)，73-88。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.200806.0073
- 洪裕宏（2018）。Does Brain Science Disprove Free Will?。生命教育研究，10(2)，29-37。https://doi.org/10.3966/207466012018121002002