並列摘要
This article offers an introductory analysis of the philosophical and empirical considerations having to do with the significance of psychopathy, intellectual disability and ADHD regarding one's moral responsibility. Moral responsibility comes in degrees and is ultimately determined on social grounds. Whether a certain diagnosis and its underpinning neuro-cognitive impairment affects one's cognitive, emotional and moral conduct, depends also on social and relational factors.
延伸閱讀
- 胡月娟、鄭小玲、蕭芳宜、陳麗華、何榮松（2007）。The Establishment of Standardized Disability Assessment。長期照護雜誌，11(1)，1-19。https://doi.org/10.6317/LTC.200703_11(1).0001
- 游承霖（2005）。The Incompatibility of Determinism and Moral Responsibility〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.02543
- 董和銳（2003）。The Conceptual Framework of Disability and Its Social Implications。身心障礙研究季刊，1(1)，32-42。https://doi.org/10.30072/JDR.200307.0003
- 朱德明（1979）。Developing World and Disability。中華民國復健醫學會雜誌，(7)，42-46。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10253009-197912-x-7-42-46-o
- Tam, M. H. (2009). Understanding disability and poor self-rated health [master's thesis, The University of Hong Kong]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0029-1812201200016549