透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.102.225
  • 期刊

梁啟超幾個前後不一的清代學術論述

Liang Qi-chao's Several Changing Academic Studies in Qing Dynasty

摘要


在近代中國的學術舞台上,梁啟超(1873~1929)是一個多變、屢變的人物。他一生論學,不僅會隨「時與境之變而變」,於不同的時期,於同一問題,會有不同的論斷;有時也會因「感情之豐富」、「腦識之發達」,於同一時期,於同一問題,而有數說。梁啟超對於清代學術的論述,就有不少這樣的多變、屢變,前後不一的問題。討論梁啟超之學,一定要先掌握其整體的論述,從其整體的論述中去關照,才能得其宗旨血脈,對其所下的論斷,也才不會偏頗。本文試擇梁啟超有關清代學術的分期、戴震《孟子字義疏證》的論述、漢宋學術論爭的平議、乾嘉考據學的評價等,幾個前後有著不同論述的問題,加以考察並從中探索其所論的微意與用心。

關鍵字

梁啟超 清代學術 流質易變

並列摘要


Liang Qi-chao (梁啟超) (1873-1929) devoted all his life to studying and uncovering Chinese academic thoughts. Qing-dynasty academic study was also his major concern so that he had written Modern Academic Studies, A General Introduction to Qing Dynasty Academia, The Academic History of China in Recent Three Hundred Years, all of which were important Books on the study of Qing dynasty academic studies. Although these works all focused on the academic traditional change, their diverse perspectives and observatory dimensions made them excellent in different ways. In addition, Liang's academic views changed with time, so that he frequently made different comments on the same issue because of various historicity. For this, in an attempt to get a full understanding of his learning, we' ve got to get a full picture of the views in different historicity, and analyzed them in detail. This paper aims to reveal his studies on Qing dynasty academic learning which however were attached with incoherent comments. The scope includes the periodization of Qing dynasty academic studies, Dai Zhen's academic comments on ”Meng Zi' s Analytical View on Etymology," A Final Comment on the Controversial Views on the Academic Debates in Han and Song Dynasties, A Valuation of Archaic Studies in Qian-Jia Periods, etc. In this way, we can uncover Liang's opinion and intention towards his own academic studies.

參考文獻


丁文江(1972)。梁任公先生年譜長編初稿。台北:世界書局。
方東樹(1967)。漢學商兌。台北:藝文印書館。
洪亮吉(1969)。卷施閣甲集。台北:文海書局。
胡適(1986)。四十自述。台北:遠流出版公司。
凌廷堪(1998)。校禮堂文集。北京:中華書局。

延伸閱讀