Background and Objectives: With the aims of reducing human errors, improving patient safety, and containing hospital instrument costs, the objectives of this study were to standardize operation room instrument management protocols and to evaluate their performance. Methods: By establishing standard operation procedures for instrument counting, multiple instrument management protocols were implemented in February 2006. The completion rates of instrument counting and instrument loss rates were evaluated before and 3 months after initiation of the protocols. Chi-squared test and ANOVA were used investigate the efficacy of the quality improvement intervention. Results: The completion rates of instrument counting at 4 checkpoints for single surgeries improved from 81% to 95% (p<0.05). The instrument loss rates were reduced from 0.69 to 0.32/surgery. The average cost incurred from instrument losses remained unchanged (p>0.05), due to a limited follow-up duration. Conclusions: Standardization of operation procedures with regular audits is critical to the success of operating room instrument management. Continuous quality improvement efforts are being implemented with the aim of reducing instrument loss to zero; we believe this can further contain hospital instrument costs, enhance management competency, and improve operating room service quality and safety.
Background and Objectives: With the aims of reducing human errors, improving patient safety, and containing hospital instrument costs, the objectives of this study were to standardize operation room instrument management protocols and to evaluate their performance. Methods: By establishing standard operation procedures for instrument counting, multiple instrument management protocols were implemented in February 2006. The completion rates of instrument counting and instrument loss rates were evaluated before and 3 months after initiation of the protocols. Chi-squared test and ANOVA were used investigate the efficacy of the quality improvement intervention. Results: The completion rates of instrument counting at 4 checkpoints for single surgeries improved from 81% to 95% (p<0.05). The instrument loss rates were reduced from 0.69 to 0.32/surgery. The average cost incurred from instrument losses remained unchanged (p>0.05), due to a limited follow-up duration. Conclusions: Standardization of operation procedures with regular audits is critical to the success of operating room instrument management. Continuous quality improvement efforts are being implemented with the aim of reducing instrument loss to zero; we believe this can further contain hospital instrument costs, enhance management competency, and improve operating room service quality and safety.