目的:急性闌尾炎行闌尾切除手術,是台灣目前最常見的急診手術。然而文獻上,陰性闌尾切除率,仍有85%左右。在台灣健保Case Payment的給付下,善用有限醫療資源理念下,對於臨床醫師、尤其是外科醫師,強調理學檢查之重要性。方法:同一位外科主治醫師於連續半年內,在其值班時,由急診醫師診斷為急性闌尾炎而會診本人的病例為研究對象。有42位病人,經仔細的理學檢查,例行性血液、尿液及胸腹X光檢驗,作為手術與否之主要依據。結果:42病人中,有34人行闌尾切除手術。其中男性20人、女性14人,平均年齡33歲。19位(55.9%)屬單純性 (simple)急性闌尾炎,15位(44.1%)屬複雜性(complicated)急性闌尾炎。而以發病至醫院求診這段時間(patient's delay)作為比較,複雜性闌尾炎比單純性闌尾炎較長久(41.5 hours vs. 22.5 hours, p<0.05)。平均住院日數為4.7日。一位病人傷口感染(2.9%)。這34位闌尾切除病人,其病理化驗全為急性闌尾炎,故本研究陰性闌尾切除率為零。其餘8位未接受闌尾切除手術病人,於住院數日後分別於不同診斷下出院,並追蹤壹個月,未有因急性闌尾炎接受治療。結論:對於一位有經驗的外科醫師,陰性闌尾切除是可以避免的。在目前台灣健保Case Payment的給付下,手術前仔細的理學檢查是診斷急性闌尾炎有效且經濟的方法。
Background and Purpose: To justify the detail preoperative physical examination is effective and economic method in diagnosing acute appendicitis under the Payment System of National Health Insurance in Taiwan. Methods: During the past 6-month period, a prospective study was done. Forty-two suspected acute appendicitis patients (age from 8 to 88 years old) were consecutively admitted under the same duty surgeon's service. Routine laboratory examinations and chest plus abdominal x rays were essentially performed in each patient. Results: All thirty-four patients with persistent local tenderness received appendectomy (male 20, female 14). The mean age was 33 years old. Nineteen patients (55.9%) had simple appendicitis; fifteen patients (44.1%) had complicated appendicitis. Patient's delay (onset to hospital) is significantly longer in complicated appendicitis compared to patients with simple appendicitis (41.5 hours vs. 22.5 hours, p<0.05). The mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. One patient had wound infection (2.9%). None negative appendectomy was done in this study. The other eight patients were discharged without operation after essential investigations. Conclusion: Negative appendectomy can be avoided by an experienced surgeon. Physical examination is effective and economic method in diagnosing acute appendicitis under the payment system of National Health Insurance in Taiwan.