試論《古今詩刪》、《詩歸》中陶淵明詩之編選意識

The study of ＂Gujinshishan＂ and ＂Shigui＂ of Tao Yuanming's edition awareness

張日郡(Jih-Chun Chang)

《語文與國際研究》 16期 (2016/12) Pp. 125-144

https://doi.org/10.3966/181147172016120016006

摘要

明代「後七子」領袖的李攀龍(1514-1570)編選《古今詩刪》，此部詩歌選本所透顯出來的意識，即為詩歌必須「復古」，於是所編選的古今詩人之詩作均可視為「復古派」之典範。到了晚明，竟陵派鍾惺（1574-1625）與譚元春（1586-1637）同樣透過編選詩歌選本《詩歸》來呈現自己的詩學理論，並且欲以此與復古派之思潮相互抗衡。本文欲針對被譽為「古今隱逸詩人之宗」的陶淵明，其詩作入選之情形作進一步探討。一方面，凸顯兩者如何透過評選的方式，詮釋陶淵明及其詩，另一方面，亦可觀看陶淵明在明代詩學的接受情形。

關鍵字

竟陵派 ； 復古派 ； 古今詩刪 ； 詩歸

並列摘要

The leader of Hochiz, Li Panlong (1514-1570) edited ＂Gujinshishan＂ in the Ming dynasty. The consciousness of these choice poem must be ＂retro＂, so the poems which was choice from the past to nowadays may be seen the paradigm of ＂retro school＂. To the late of Ming dynasty, Jingling School Zhong Xing of Jingling School (1574-1625) and Tan Yuan Chun (1586-1637) also show their theory of poem by Shigui against retro school. This article for the known as the ＂The father of hidden poet in ancient age and modem age＂ - Tao Yuanming, to study how his poems was selected and edited deeply. We can suggest how the two men interpret Tao Yuanming and his poems by the selected poems, in the other side, we also observed the condition of the Identity of Tao's poems in the Ming Dynasty.

並列關鍵字

Jingling school ； Retro school ； Gujinshishan ； Shigui

參考文獻

梁鍾嶸(1980)。詩品注。北京:人民出版社。

〔宋〕朱熹：《晦庵先生朱文公集》(《四部叢刊初編》 )

〔明〕宋濂：《宋學士全集》(四庫備要本）

明梁蘭(1978)。畦樂詩集。台北:台灣商務印書館。

明李東陽(1984)。李東陽集。長沙:岳麓書社。