科技校院教師評鑑的後設評鑑

Meta-evaluation of Faculty Evaluation of Technological College and University

曾淑惠(Shu-Hui Tseng)

《技術及職業教育學報》 6卷1期 (2015/05) Pp. 41-63

https://doi.org/10.6235/TVE.2412

摘要

本研究旨在藉由對科技校院教師評鑑品質及提議的探究，勾勒出科技校院教師評鑑的樣貌，主要採專家訪談、德懷術及問卷調查三種方法，共計9位專家接受訪談、15位擔任德懷術專家進行三回合問卷以凝聚共識，並發展問卷共寄發715份，回收486位教師的意見（問卷回收率68%）。主要研究結果包括：（一）衡量科技校院教師評鑑品質的規準，計有適切性、效用性、可行性以及精確性四項度計41項規準內容；（二）私立學校教師對其所屬學校教師評鑑制度，在效用、可行以及精確性品質規準肯定度不高；（三）設計科技校院教師評鑑制度仍有五大類的議題須要留意。

關鍵字

科技校院 ； 教師評鑑 ； 後設評鑑

並列摘要

This study focused on the quality and proposals of faculty evaluation in universities/colleges of technology. It was conducted mainly through expert interview, the Delphi technique, and questionnaire survey. Specifically, there were 9 experts interviewed. As for the Delphi method procedure, 15 scholars were consulted in three rounds in order to reach a consensus. Totally, 486 questionnaires were collected from faculty in universities/colleges of technology. The result of the study was as follows: 1. The criteria for measuring the quality of faculty evaluation in universities/colleges of technology include 4 dimensions, i.e. the propriety, the utility, the feasibility, and the accuracy, all of which consist of 41 items of the criteria. 2. When it comes to the individual faculty evaluation system, faculty of the private universities/colleges of technology show low confidence in the quality of the indicators referring to the utility, the feasibility, and the accuracy. 3. During evaluation system design processes, there are 5 issues to take good care of.

並列關鍵字

universities/colleges of technology ； faculty evaluation ； meta-evaluation

參考文獻

吳清山、林天佑(2005)。後設評鑑。教育研究月刊。137，159。

吳佩真、張民杰(2007)。國內大學教師教學評鑑現況分析。評鑑雙月刊。9，9-15。

徐明珠()。,未出版。

莊荏惠、阮勝威(2008)。後現代主義對於科技大學教師評鑑的啟示。樹德科技大學學報。10(2)，167-179。

孫志麟(2007)。績效控制或專業發展？大學教師評鑑的兩難。教育實踐與研究。20(2)，95-128。