透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.158.47
  • 期刊

案例討論於社區醫療照護團隊教育成效之初探

Application of A Case Study Teaching Method in Community Hospice Health Care Providers- A Pilot Study

摘要


背景:政府於2014年1月起,新增社區安寧療護服務納入健保給付,鼓勵社區基層醫療院所亦能投入生命末期之照護。雖多數基層醫療人員對安寧療護有所認知,但照護方式及內容較缺少經驗。研究目的:以ADDIE教育模式研擬之案例討論教育課程,提供社區醫療照護人員不同之學習,增加其對末期病人之照護能力。材料與方法:由臨床專家共同擬定包含多種臨床情境之案例,進行分組討論,另有安寧緩和醫療條例臨床運用常見問題及哀傷輔導之講授。評值工具為學員之前後測及課程滿意度。結果與結論:參與課程共78位,護理師51位最多(65.4%),有22位(28.2%)工作於地區醫院為最多。後測之各題答對率均有提高,整體答對率後測平均為85.6%,較前測平均之74.1%高,且達統計之顯著差異(t= 9.38, p< .005)。課程滿意度達4.41分(滿分5分),自評對未來工作之助益為4.39分(滿分5分)。初步顯示結合臨床情境與學理之案例有別於一般傳統式教學,增加學員學習效果,有效達成教學目標。

並列摘要


Backhground: Since January 2014, the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan has included community hospice care service into National Health Insurance in order to encourage community health care porviders to participate in this service. Although most of them have some concepts about hospice care service, they are still lack of the practical experience. Purpose: By ADDIE education model, we develop a case-discussion workshop of hospice care to offer basic hospice care abilities for health care porviders. Method: Clinical hospice care experts develop multi-scene cases for group discussion conference in the workshop. Besides, experts will give two topic lectrures of clinical obstacles about Hospice Palliative Care Regulation and bereavement management. The evaluation tools are pre-test, post-test sheet and the satisfication survey. Results:There were 78 paritcipators attended the workshop, with 51 nurses (65.4%) and 22(28.2%) working in the distrinct hospitals. The correct answer rate raised from 74.1% of pre-test to 85.6% of post-test and had statistical differences (t= 9.38, p< .005). The satisfication rate of the workshop was 4.41(total score was 5), and the rate of “helpfulness for the future clinical practice” was 4.39(total 5). The pilot results appeared that this multi-scene cases discussion conference workshop combined with topic lectrures (the short class) were effective and helpful for the incumbent health providers.

參考文獻


李英芬、李佩怡、劉景萍、任珮君、謝瑞坤、蔡麗雲。安寧共同照護介入對非安寧病房之癌症末期病人及其家屬之照護成效探討。馬偕護理雜誌 2012;6:14-27。
何致德、林文元、林正介。安寧共同照護服務:社區推展的創新模式。臺灣醫學 2011:15:32-36。
潘玉玲、高偉堯、陳坤虎、黃國哲。接受安寧住院及安寧共同照護病人照護滿意度之比較-以某醫學中心爲例。中華職業醫學雜誌 2009;16:235-244。
Yao CA, Hu WY, Lai YF. Does dying at home influence the good death of terminal cancer patients? Journal Pain Symptom Manage 2007;34:497-504.
翁瑞萱、徐愫萱、施至遠、黃勝堅。台灣社區安寧居家療護之現在與未來。護理雜誌 2015;62:18-24。

被引用紀錄


蔡旻秀、張亦慧、王靜瑜、楊久嫻、劉子沄、李純瑩、陳虹錚、吳建誼(2021)。「社區安寧」整合性照護網絡建立與運作之成效安寧療護雜誌25(3),253-268。https://doi.org/10.6537/TJHPC.202107_25(3).04
林瑞祥、李佩芬(2018)。從獨白到對話-糖尿病自我管理教育的演變護理雜誌65(5),20-26。https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.201810_65(5).04

延伸閱讀