透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.69.152
  • 期刊

印順導師與布特曼解「經」路徑比較-兼論批判「非神化」者之謬誤

Comparative Study on Different Path in Hermeneutic by Master Yinshun and Rudolf Bultmann - and on the Fallacy of Criticizing the "Demystification"

摘要


印順與布特曼是兩位對宗教在現代性處境下進行了積極回應的哲學家,他們為了闡發宗教給予人類的核心價值,即「超越性」,重新詮釋了各自所信仰的宗教的經典文本。本文比較了印順對佛教的「非神化」與布特曼對基督教的「去神話化」的不同路徑,指出就二人對各自所信仰的宗教進行理性化的詮釋來說,雖然背後思維運作迥異,但最後呈現的方式及其結果卻有異曲同工之妙:印順以佛學特有的理性思維解構佛教神秘之幕,將被放逐的超越性通過理論層面引回當下現實的日常實踐;布特曼則以哲學解釋學特有的理性思維解讀並維護了《聖經》文本的神秘之維,通過存在主義式的哲學闡明使被遮蔽的超越性在生存意識中獲得揭示。在中國大陸有個別學者對印順自佛教本源思想中開出的「非神化」路徑進行所謂的「批判」,本文亦隨文所至揭露其謬誤並究其根源。

關鍵字

超越性 印順 布特曼 去神話化 理性化

並列摘要


Master Yin-shun and Rudolf Bultmann were two philosophers who responded positively to Religion in the situation of Modernity. They reinterpret the classic texts of the religions they believe in the core values of religion, that is, "transcendence". This paper compares the different paths between the "demystification" of Buddhism and Bultmann's "demythology" to Christianity. It points out that when the two people explain their religions rationally, though their thinking operations are very different, the way and result of the final presentation are quite similar-with the unique rational thinking of Buddhism, Yin-shun deconstructed the curtain of the Buddhist mystery, and will bring transcendence back to the daily practice of the present reality through the theoretical level, while Bultmann unscrambles and maintains the mystery of the Bible text with the unique rational thinking of Philosophical Hermeneutics through the philosophical explanation of existentialism, the transcendence that has been obscured is revealed in the consciousness of "Existenz". In the mainland, some scholars have made a so-called "criticism" on the "demystification" path from the original thought of Buddhism. This article also reveals its fallacies and its root cause.

參考文獻


卡爾‧雅斯貝爾斯餘靈靈譯(1988)。存在與超越─雅斯貝爾斯文集。上海:三聯書店。
釋印順(2011)。以佛法研究佛法。北京:中華書局。
釋印順(2011)。印度之佛教。北京:中華書局。
釋印順(2010)。成佛之道。北京:中華書局。
釋印順(2011)。初期大乘佛教之起源與開展。北京:中華書局。

延伸閱讀