透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.197.212
  • 期刊

芬蘭赫爾辛基一間學校的現象為本學習個案研究

THE PHENOMENON-BASED LEARNING IN A MIDDLE SCHOOL IN FINLAND

摘要


研究目的:基於跨領域教學是我國課程改革的重要議題,本研究探討芬蘭赫爾辛基個案學校實施現象為本學習的經驗,期為我國推動新課綱之參考。研究設計/方法/取徑:本研究採個案研究法,以芬蘭一間公立學校為研究場域,研究時程為一年。蒐集資料的方法包括參與觀察、訪談與文件分析。研究發現或結論:本研究發現主要有三:一、個案學校師生常態性運作的探究取向教學文化為實施現象為本學習創造有利環境;二、個案學校籌劃與實施現象為本學習週主要關注面向在「設定統整策略與主題」、「加強學生對『統整』能力的覺察」、「鼓勵探索關鍵事件或人、事物、現象之間關係」;三、個案學校慎思現象為本學習週的評量以「學習如何學習」為主要籌劃方向。研究原創性/價值:國內目前尚無較長期蹲點芬蘭課室的現象為本學習研究。基於芬蘭教育向來為我國關注,且跨領域教學議題正引起討論,本研究可作為本土課程改革或課室教學實踐之參考,甚至作為未來長期追蹤研究分析的基礎。

並列摘要


Purpose: This study explores the praxis of phenomenon-based learning in a middle school in Helsinki, Finland. It is expected that the findings of this study could provide suggestions for the implementation of interdisciplinary teaching and learning which is the core for new curriculum reform in Taiwan. Design/methodology/approach: This study conducted a one-year field study in a public comprehensive school. The methods for data collection included participant observation, interview and document analysis. Findings/results: Three key findings emerged from this study. First, the inquiry-based approach usually implemented by the case school created a favorable environment for phenomenon-based learning. Second, the focuses of Phenomenon-based Learning Week were "determining integration strategy and learning theme," "promoting students' awareness of integration ability," and "exploring key events or the relationship between people, things and phenomena". Finally, "learning how to learn" was the main purpose of assessment. Originality/value: The approaches of interdisciplinary teaching and learning of Finland education have been attracted attention in Taiwan. However, Taiwan has few field studies on phenomenon-based learning in Finnish classrooms. The results of this study provides references for curriculum reform or classroom practice in Taiwan. Furthermore, this study may also be regarded as the basis for long-term follow-up studies in the future.

參考文獻


周淑卿主編(2002)。課程統整模式原理與實作。濤石。[Chou, S. C. (Ed.). (2002). Principle and implementation of curriculum integration model. Waterstone.]
陳玟樺、劉美慧(2018)。從聯合國《兒童權利公約》反思我國學生參與課綱審查之重要課題。當代教育研究季刊,26(4),1-45。[Chen, W. H. & Liu, M. H. (2018). Important issues on Taiwan students’participation in curriculum deliberation council: Reflecting from UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 26(4), 1-45.]
陳玟樺、劉美慧(2021)。芬蘭一間學校的現象為本學習課程統整設計與學生學習表現。教育研究集刊,67(1),107-157。[Chen, W. H. & Liu, M. H. (2021). A Finnish School’s phenomenon-based learning curriculum integration design and students’ learning performance. Bulletin of Educational Research, 67(1), 107-157.]
陳毓凱、洪振方(2007)。兩種探究取向教學模式之分析與比較。科學教育,305(3),4-19。[Chen, Y. K. & Hung, J. F. (2007). The Comparison and Analysis of Two Inquiryoriented Teaching Models. Science Education Monthly, 305(3), 4-19.]
黃政傑(1995)。課程設計。東華。[Hwang, J. J. (Ed.). (1995). Curriculum design. Tunghua.]

被引用紀錄


符碧真、李冠穎(2023)。面對108新課綱的「探究與實作」:師資培育「雙實作」的教育實踐課程教育科學研究期刊68(3),239-273。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_68(3).0008

延伸閱讀