並列摘要
In this article, the author has to admit that there are indeed a lot of variables unexplained, and all the observers and policy makers are like a blind to touch upon an huge elephant from different perspectives. However, the author finds that China is using the controlled approaches of decision making to handle the case of the anti-secession law. They expect resistance, anger and uproar, but still decide to stick to their principles. They do not delay the decision for the purpose of seeking a perfect decision, they adjust along the process. Again, they take a dialectical and procedural attitude in making the law. Principle is not bendable, but tactics appears adjustable. In a sense, Beijing is also trying to take the strategic higher ground to define the status quo and uses the so-called strategic clarity and tactical ambiguity to deal with Taiwan. It is also true that there is an anti secession law but with different interpretations. Hu is now against Chen, and China is using creeping unification versus Taiwan's creeping independence. In the end, which is side is going to win is still hard to predict at this point.
被引用紀錄
延伸閱讀
- 蔡瑋（2005）。Analysis of the ＂Anti-Secession Law＂ and International Reactions。展望與探索月刊，3(4)，6-9。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20200116001-200504-202003260019-202003260019-6-9
- 王光正、黃秋龍（2005）。Anti-Secession Law and the Commitment Strategy。問題與研究，44(5)，29-52。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.200510_44(5).0002
- 邵宗海（2006）。The Analysis and Evalution of the Anti-Secession Law。遠景基金會季刊，7(2)，1-51。https://doi.org/10.7063/PQ.200604.0001
- 范文清（2015）。On the Constitutionality of Restriction on Leaving the State。東吳法律學報，27(2)，35-99。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=02593750-201510-201602220006-201602220006-35-99
- 吳怡慧（2020）。Analysis of Legislative Success and Failure of Unconstitutional Law〔碩士論文，國立政治大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202001690