- 期刊
The Anti-Secession Law and Distributive Negotiation across the Taiwan Strait
並列摘要
This paper uses a distributive negotiation perspective to examine the role of the Anti-Secession Law in the sovereign struggle between Taipei and Beijing. The influence and function of the Law may not meet the needs of Beijing leaders largely because Taipei does not feel (or does not want to know) the increasing costs of refusing to engage in cross-strait negotiation after the enactment of the Law. That is, the Law in the context of Taipei-Beijing distributive negotiation does not play a very crucial role. The fundamental framework of cross-strait relations will remain unaffected after the enactment of the Law.
參考文獻
Taipei Times(2005/05/08)
The Heritage Foundation Webmemo #629
Roger Fisher,William Ury,Bruce Patton(1983).Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving.New York:Penguin Books.
Roy J. Lewicki,David M. Saunders,John W. Minton(1997).Essentials of Negotiation.New York:Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
David Lax,James Sebenius,J. William Breslin (eds.),Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds.)(1991).Negotiation Theory and Practice.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Program on Negotiation Books, Harvard Law School.
延伸閱讀
- 李酉潭、張孝評（2004）。Democratization and Peace in the Taiwan Strait。問題與研究，43(4)，1-34。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.200408_43(4).0001
- 曾建元、彭艾喬（2007）。On Taiwan's Counter Legal Actions to the Anti-Secession Law。中華人文社會學報，(7)，38-58。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18142826-200709-x-7-38-58-a
- 林濁水（2004）。"Anti-Secession Law" and China's Strategy toward Taiwan。國家發展研究，4(1)，207-240。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10171355-200412-4-1-207-240-a
- 沈宜卉（2007）。A Constitutionalist Analysis of the Institutionalization of Referendum in Taiwan〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.02831
- 劉國斯（2008）。Reviewing and Exploring the Issue of National Sovereignty on Both Sides of the Taiwan Strait。人文暨社會科學期刊，4(2)，27-38。https://doi.org/10.7118/JHSS.200812.0027