我國申辦亞運會城市評選指標之建構

Developing the Indicators Used to Select Taiwan's Bid Cities for the Asian Games

廖俊儒(Chun-Ju Liao)

《臺灣體育運動管理學報》 12卷3期 (2012/09) Pp. 179-196

https://doi.org/10.6547/tassm.2012.0009

摘要

本研究目的在於透過焦點團體法，探討我國目前申辦亞運會城市評選過程的缺點；最後，再藉由徳爾菲法建構出具體的申辦亞運會代表城市的評選指標，以做為未來我國申辦亞運會及其他大型國際運動賽會評選之基礎。研究對象為曾參與過大型國際賽會相關研究或申辦之學者及我國申辦大型國際賽會之正式相關組織代表，合計10位專家。研究期間自2010年8月至2011年9月。研究結果發現：一、我國目前亞運會申辦城市評選程序之缺點，包括：（一）評選程序不夠明確；（二）評選過程不夠客觀；（三）評選指標不夠廣泛。二、本研究建構出我國評選亞運會申辦城市之具體指標共12大項主題，33項具體分項指標。本研究之結論：我國評選亞運會的程序應有修正的空間，而本研究所建構的具體指標可做為未來國內進行評選代表我國申辦亞運會城市及其他大型國際運動賽會時的重要客觀參考工具。

關鍵字

大型國際運動賽會 ； 奧運會 ； 世界大學運動會

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to identify the weaknesses in a city's bidding process for international mega-sport events in Taiwan by using a focus group; and second, to develop the indicators used to select Taiwan's cities that should bid for the Asian Games and other international mega-sport events by using the Delphi technique. Ten experts participated in this study, including professionals with previous experience in researching and developing the bidding process of international mega-sport events, and members of formal organization who submit the bids. The study was conducted from August 2010 to September 2011. We found that the bidding process was not clearly outlined and was not objective, and that the indicators were not adequately broad. The indicators used to select a bid city for the Asian Games comprised 12 topics and 33 tactics. We concluded that the process for selecting a bid city for international mega-sport events must be modified. The indicators developed in this study offer an objective instrument for selecting Taiwan's cities to bid for the Asian Games and other international mega-sport events in the future.

並列關鍵字

international mega-sport event ； Olympic Games ； Universiade

參考文獻

呂錘卿、林生傳(2001)。國民小學教師專業成長指標及現況之研究。教育學刊。17，45-64。

林中進(2006)。申辦國際綜合運動賽會成敗因素研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。

唐慧媛(2009)。德菲法理論於體育運動科學之應用。文化體育學刊。9，81-88。

程紹同編(2011)。運動賽會管理。新北市:揚智。

程紹同、方信淵、廖俊儒、呂宏進(2011)。運動管理學導論三版。臺北市:華泰。