Theorizing Journalism Education, Citizenship, and New Media Technologies in a Global Media Age

Paul Mihailidis ； Moses Shumow

《Taiwan Journal of Democracy》 7卷2期 (2011/12) Pp. 27-47

https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.201112.0003

並列摘要

This essay details the results of fifty-four open-ended interview questionnaires with university-level communication students from eleven countries, exploring the opportunities and challenges for journalism and news in participatory democracy. The study participants were enrolled in a three-week summer global media literacy program, at the end of which they were asked to complete an open-ended survey questionnaire, asking about the role digital media technologies and social media platforms have on journalism and its role in a participatory democracy. Results highlight a general negativity toward the growing influence of new media technologies in journalism with regard to objectivity, autonomy, balance, and depth, juxtaposed with the embrace of the same technologies in contributing to greater citizen participation, voice, and inclusion in journalism and news flow. This divide raises questions around the relationship between journalism, journalism education, and technology in the context of participatory citizenship. The study concludes by recommending a more integrative model for journalism education than presently followed that addresses the disjuncture evidenced in this study between professional notions of journalism and participatory citizenship in the digital age.

並列關鍵字

News literacy ； journalism education ； global ； digital media ； citizenship

參考文獻

John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems (Chicago: Gateway Books [Original version published in 1927], 1947).

Habermas, Jurgen(1989).The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Lippmann, Walter(1957).Public Opinion.New York:Macmillan.

Zaller, John(2003).A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen.Political Communication.20,109-130.

Schudson, Michael(2009).Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press.Cambridge, England:Polity Press.