透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.31.239

並列摘要


Over the last decades, provisions for direct democracy mechanisms increasingly have been added to new constitutions and more questions have been decided by referendum votes around the world in consolidated, new, or reestablished democracies. These mechanisms are usually classified according to who initiated the call: mandatory referendum (by law), referendum by legislatures and office holders (top-down), or citizen referendum and initiative (bottom-up). While the first and the second types have been studied in a comparative approach, the third remains an issue for case studies mainly (e.g., Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Italy). However, despite incomplete research, bottom-up direct democracy is seen as a way for citizenry to exercise veto power (refusing laws or constitutional amendments) or to innovate (propose bills). This essay challenges this common assumption by analyzing all the experiences of bottom-up direct democracy at the national level worldwide (1874-2009). It is suggested that even so-called bottom-up referendums could be used (a) to concentrate power, (b) to serve as a partisan strategy, and, rather exceptionally, (c) to empower citizens and civil society. While the first type shows a similar pattern to top-down direct democracy in hybrid regimes or nonconsolidated democracies, and the second type works as a political party's strategy to increase membership and votes, only the last type could reinvigorate democracy, although to what extent this is happening needs further research.

參考文獻


Hug, Simon,Tsebelis, George(2002).Veto Players and Referendums around the World.Journal of Theoretical Politics.14(4),465-515.
Welp, Yanina,Serdült, Uwe(2009).Armas de Doble Filo. La participación ciudadana en la encrucijada.Buenos Aires:Prometeo.
Altman, David(2011).Direct Democracy Worldwide.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
Auer, Andreas(2007).National Referendums in the Process of European Integration: Time for Change.The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond.(The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond).:
Kaufmann, Bruno,Waters, Dane M.(2004).Direct Democracy in Europe.Durham, NC:Carolina Academic Press.

被引用紀錄


黃奕超(2010)。量能原則與納稅人程序保障-以租稅申報程序為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.00662
kao, C. C. (2004). 我國公民投票實施經驗之研究 [master's thesis, Yuan Ze University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0009-0112200611340777

延伸閱讀


  • Jacques Rancière、薛熙平(2012)。Politics, Democracy and the Present文化研究(15),350-367。https://doi.org/10.6752/JCS.201209_(15).0021
  • 陳瑤華(2003)。Autonomy and Democracy人文及社會科學集刊15(2),339-363。https://doi.org/10.6350/JSSP.200306.0339
  • 邱延正(2016)。The Essence of Constitutional Democracy復興崗學報(109),139-157。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=04298063-201612-201612270022-201612270022-139-157
  • 林向愷(2008)。Corruption and Democracy臺灣民主季刊5(3),167-176。https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200809.0167
  • 許國賢(2020)。Disappointment and Democracy行政暨政策學報(70),1-31。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17286425-202006-202009040007-202009040007-1-31

國際替代計量