- 期刊
- OpenAccess
Political Islam and the Limits of the Indonesian Model
並列摘要
This essay argues that the roots of successful Islamist political mobilization in new democracies lie in the developmental trajectories of the authoritarian regimes that preceded them. Tunisia under Ben Ali and Egypt under Mubarak, where Islamists flourished in opposition, are examples of corrupted development, in which the failure of a secular regime to provide widely shared increases in material prosperity facilitated mass opposition to authoritarian rule under various forms of Islamism. Indonesia under Suharto represents corrupt development, in which sustained improvements in material welfare hamstrung the ability of a nascent Islamist opposition to develop a broad movement base. These differences in the breadth of opposition to incumbent authoritarian regimes, in turn, explain the failure of Islamism as an electoral force in Indonesia, and its success in Tunisia and Egypt.
參考文獻
被引用紀錄
延伸閱讀
- 游雅雯（2011）。Political Islam in Malaysia: A Post-Colonial Perspective〔博士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.10175
- Frank, D. (2019). Muslim Religious Violence as Political Maneuver in Colonial and Post-War Indonesia: a Critical Overview. 新世紀宗教研究, 17(3), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.3966/168437382019031703002
- 區鉅龍（1997）。Continuity and Change in indonesian Politics。問題與研究，36(12)，51-58。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.199712_36(12).0004
- Deasy Simandjuntak（2021）。Challenges to Indonesia's Democracy: Beyond Religious Polarization。亞太研究論壇，(69)，9-47。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20230502003-N202305090012-00001
- 賴俊榮（2014）。An Analysis of Indonesia`s New Era Foreign Policy〔碩士論文，淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00062