透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.154.151
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

Democratic Design and Democratic Reform The Case of Australia

摘要


Distinctive aspects of Australian democracy-high levels of participation, aggregative voting systems, and a utilitarian preference for government to play the role of both rulemaker and arbiter-are rooted in the institutional configuration of Australian politics. This essay argues that Australia's unique combination of majoritarian and proportional preferential electoral models has seen the emergence of a political system which, for the most part, has balanced the need for strong government in the lower House of Representatives with broader representation in the Senate. Preferential voting also has tended to push Australian politics toward the center, avoiding the polarization found in comparable democracies such as the United States. As a result, Australian electoral institutions are increasingly being examined, advocated, or adopted elsewhere.

參考文獻


Sawer, Marian(ed.)(2001).Elections: Full, Free and Fair.Sydney:Federation Press.
Lijphart, Arend(1984).Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries.New Haven:Yale University Press.
Thompson, Elaine(1980).The 'Washminster' Mutation.Politics.15(2),32-40.
Collins, Hugh(1985).Political Ideology in Australia: The Distinctiveness of a Benthamite Society.Daedalus.114(1),147-169.
Hart, Jennifer(1995).Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System 1820-1945.Oxford:Clarendon Press.

被引用紀錄


BOZZATO, F. (2017). 海龍:中國在南太平洋區域的影響,新平衡與新融合 [doctoral dissertation, Tamkang University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00987
蔡育真(2012)。澳洲對中美在南太平洋權力競逐之回應〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.00685

延伸閱讀