透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

專利聯營與聯合行為

Patent Pool and Concerted Action in Taiwan

摘要


專利制度與競爭政策之交錯,一向是法律爭議之所在。在台灣,專利聯營爲競爭法帶來了新的難題。台灣的飛利浦光碟案,在歷經公平交易委員會認定專利聯營屬於聯合行爲後,台北高等行政法院做出「若專利聯營自互補性專利組成,則不會格成聯合行爲」之判決,專利聯營在台灣公平交易法上似已獲得平反。本文主張由互補性專利組成之專利聯營仍有可能構成聯合行爲,在台灣公平交易法的適用前提上,只有當專利聯營是純粹由必要性專利組成之情況下,才不會構成聯合行爲。

並列摘要


The crisscross of the patent system and competition policy always leads to the legal dilemma. In Taiwan, patent pool raises a new difficult era of Taiwan competition law. The Philips CD-R patent pool case judged by Taipei high administrative court seems to bring the dawn of patent pool issue because it held that ”if the patents that are being pooled are complementary, such patent pool will not constitute a concerted action.” This article argues that even if the patents that are being pooled are complementary, such patent pool might still constitute a concerted action unless it comprises essential patents.

被引用紀錄


周相攸(2010)。技術標準中關鍵專利之專利權限制—以關鍵設施理論與誠信原則為中心〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2010.00607
溫若蘭(2011)。競爭法對專利授權之規制—以專利聯營為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.02182
林慧宜(2009)。論企業之專利管理與運用〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-0207200916271572

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量