民法第166條之1施行的可行性分析

民國88年增訂民法第166條之1有關不動產交易法定公證之規定後，隨即因為可能損及不動產仲介業與地政士等團體之利益及當時公證人人數過少恐立即實施對人民並非有利等因素，而暫停施行。然迄今已逾十年，該條文究竟有無重新啟動之可能性，本文擬以國外不動產交易的法律規定及實際運作之情形對照我國之公證環境，分析該條文施行之可行性。本文第貳部份先概略介紹拉丁公證、普通公證與我國公證制度，並對三者進行比較；第叁部份開始介紹採行法定公證的德國、法國不動產交易的程序，並與我國的程序比較，進而說明公證在拉丁公證國家不動產交易程序中所佔之地位與重要性；第肆部份就我國民法第166條之1的規定進行分析，並闡述該條施行後公證人所負擔之責任義務與消費者受到之保護；最後結論部分針對該條文施行可行性進行分析，得出該條文得否解凍，應視我國目前的公證制度是否確實能夠兼俱警示、證據與諮詢之功能，達到預定保障私權、避免糾紛發生的目標。因此提出八大具體建議，期望對於政策主導機關能有一些參考的價值，並生投石問路之效。

關鍵字

民法第166條之1 ；拉丁公證；普通公證；不動產交易；公信力；實價課稅

並列摘要

Civil Law article166-1 on the notarization in the procedure of real estate transaction was passed in 1999, and then suspended immediately due to the factors of the possibility of loss of interest to real-estate agencies and scriveners, and also the few number of notaries, which might not be beneficial to the people. It has now been more than 10 years. What are the prerequisite of executing the provisions of the law? This paper attempts to compare and analyze similar laws and practices in France, Germany, and Taiwan, and feasibility of its execution.Part two of this paper will first introduce the different notary systems in the world, a comparison between Latin notary and notary public in common law. Part three describes the procedures of real estate transaction in France and Germany, in comparison to the regulations of Taiwan, and emphasizing the importance of notary in Europe. Part four explains the provision of Civil Law article166-1, notary obligation and consumer protection. The last part analyzes the feasibility to execute compulsory notary in real estate transaction, the conclusion depends on whether our notary system will bring these functions of warning, keeping evidence and consultant etc., thus addresses some suggestions for reference.

並列關鍵字

Civil Law article166-1 ； Latin Notary ； Saxon notary public ； Real estate transaction ； Public fides ； Tax on the selling price

國際替代計量

民法第166條之1施行的可行性分析

全文下載

主題瀏覽