從唐代古文運動看相應的書法概念

On the Development of Calligraphy Concepts Based on the Discussion of the Classical Chinese Literature Movement

資成都(Cheng-Du Zi)

《高雄師大國文學報》 16期 (2012/06) Pp. 121-146

https://doi.org/10.29520/BCSNKNU.201206.0006

摘要

文學與書法分屬兩種不同的藝術類型。既然如此，形式上本無可相通之處。但是，在同一文化背景之下，雖然形式不同，其個別表現方式的改變，卻有相似性。本文即以唐朝古文運動為引，繼之以文章與書法的古與今、正統性為範疇，探索二者是否經歷同樣的歷程。文分四部份：前言簡略說明二者之間的可探討性；第二部份分別分析文學與書法的古與今；第三部份分析文章與書法各自的正統性；第四、結語，歸結其中的同與異。

關鍵字

古文運動 ； 書法 ； 古今 ； 正統

並列摘要

Literature and calligraphy are two different art forms. Therefore, there can be no similarities between these two forms. However, under the influence of the same culture, some similarities may be found in the changes in their respective expressions. This paper begins with the discussion of the Classical Chinese Literature Movement in the Tang Dynasty, followed by the exploration of the respective development and the distinct orthodoxies of essays and calligraphy in the past and at the present to see if both are on the same track.This paper contains four parts. The preface briefly explains the discussibility of literature and calligraphy. The second part describes the past and the present development of these two forms. The third part analyzes the respective dogmas of essays and calligraphy. The fourth part, the conclusion, sums up the similarities and the differences between these two forms.

並列關鍵字

The Classical Chinese Literature Movement ； calligraphy ； the past and the present ； orthodoxy