亞洲男排四強接發球、防守與扣球及其進攻成效之研究

A Study on the Offensive Effect of the Spike Style and the Sideout Offensive/Transition Attack in Male Volleyball Teams of China, Korea, Japan and Taiwan

林献巃(Hsien-Lung Lin) ； 胡忠民(Chung-Ming Lu) ； 黃宏榮(Hung-Jung Huang)

《運動教練科學》 9期 (2007/12) Pp. 31-42

https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2007.09.04

摘要

前後排結合形成立體進攻戰術的興起，使排球進攻戰術邁入新階段。由於接發球進攻、防守進攻表現攸關戰術的進攻成效，而扣球爲運用最後手段。因此本研究旨在探討亞洲男子排球四強接發球、防守與扣球及其進攻成效之研究。然後透過錄影帶反覆三次的判讀而彙整資料，之後再進行統計分析，得重要結論如下：一、各國五類扣球使用次數方面，以4號位扣球使用率最多、3號位扣球次之。五類扣球進攻成效方面，如果祇看前二名之隊伍以4號位扣球及3號位扣球進攻成效較好而且使用次數也最高，代表成績與扣球攻擊使用和扣球進攻成效成正比。二、整體進攻成效方面，韓、中、日三隊都高於中華隊，不過只有中國與韓國有顯著差異優於中華隊。三、後排攻擊進攻成效方面，中國隊與日本隊有顯著差異高於中華隊。四、不論在接發球或防守進攻成效方面，接發球進攻大於防守進攻有達到的顯著差異，同時發現不管是接發球進攻或防守進攻時3號扣球及戰術攻擊進攻成效大於後排攻擊。

關鍵字

接發球 ； 防守 ； 扣球 ； 進攻成效

並列摘要

As the stereo offensive tactics is developed, the volleyball offensive tacitcs enters into a new mile stone. The offensive effect (OE) is often influenced by spike style (ST), offensive formation (OF) and sideout offensive (SO)/ transition offensive (TO). The study aims to investigate the TO of ST, organized/unorganized OF (OOF/UOF) and SO/TO. The subjects are the athletes from the top 4 teams-Korea, China, Japan and Chinese Taipei, in 2004 Asian Men's Volleyball Challenge Cup. By video tape conjectured, the five offensive styles were accounted. Meanwhile, descriptive statistics, such as frequency, mean, standard deviation, for example, was performed to find their differences. Also, one-way ANOVA analysis was used to find the differences between the teams. Two-way ANOVA analysis was performed to compare ST, OT, with five SO. The importants results include: (1) SO and styles in top 4 teams, the frequency of SO in No. 4 is the most and No.3 in SO follows. In style, No. 4 is the most in long-line SO and No.4 in adjusted SO follows. (2) In general, Chinese Taipei is significantly different from and less than the others in offence. However, China and Korea are better than Chinese Taipei. (3) In back-row offence, Chinese Taipei is significant difference from and less than China and Japan. (4) No matter sideout offence or transition attact, sideout offence is significant difference and less than transition attact, meanwhile, in both, sideout offence and tactics offence of No. 3 are better than back-row offence in offence.

並列關鍵字

spike style ； sideout offensive/transition attack ； offensive effect

參考文獻

朱先敢(2002)。我國甲A男排進攻戰術結構特徵的分析。北京體育大學學報。25(3)，407-408。

李黛芬(2000)。世界女子排球選手扣球攻擊型態與成效應用之研究。屏東市:睿煜出版社。

李詩賓(2003)。2000年雪梨奧運女子排球隊競賽攻防能力績效相關性研究－試以中國大陸女子排球隊為例。萬能學報。23，375-398。

李安格、黃輔周(1995)。現代排球。北京市:人民體育。

李函潔(2001)。排球比賽得分結構的差異性探討。大專排球研究論文集。7，131-138。