愛情學之本體論與工夫論－再論心性學與愛情學

The Noumenal Theory and the Training Theory of Amayorlogy-The re-discussing of Mentalitlogy and Amayorlogy

曾昭旭(Zhao-Xu Zeng)

《淡江中文學報》 14期 (2006/06) Pp. 1-14

https://doi.org/10.6187/tkujcl.200606.14-1

摘要

本文乃承續前作＜心性學與愛情學〉而作進一步之抒論。前作重在為愛情學在心性學上予以定位，本文則重在為愛情學之義理內涵作更進一步之釐定。
在此首先說明孔子之仁若可析分為忠（證真我之學）恕（證真愛之學），則宋明儒學重在證真我，今日之新儒學則當重在更進一步去證真愛。此乃良知推擴之本務，亦即所謂愛情學也。
本文因進論愛情學之本體論，即由主體性（心體）進而肯定主體際性（愛體）。並論愛情學之功夫論為一雙修之型態。

關鍵字

愛情學 ； 證真愛之學 ； 愛體主體際性Intersubjectivity ； 雙修

並列摘要

This paper just succeeded the prepaper (Mentalitlogy and Amayorlogy) and made a further discussing. The prepaper emphasized to define Amayorlogy from Mentalitlogy. Now we made a further definiens from the meaning of Amayorlogy.
If We could analysis Confucius's thory of ”Ren” to ”Zhong” (”Arguing-Turth-Myself”) and ”Shu” (”Arguing-Turth-Love”), we just made out that Confucianism of Sung and Ming Dynasty which emphasized to ”Arguing-Turth-Myself”. Today, the emphasis of the new Confucianism was a further proving for true love. It a in-tuitive ability to know right or wrong popularized to self-mission and an Amayor-logy, too.
This paper just discussed the noumenal theory of Amayorlogy, from noumenal (The self of Mind) to confirm Intersubjectirity (The self of Love). And argued that Amayorlogy to training theory was a state of traing each other.

並列關鍵字

Amayorlogy ； The theory of Arguing-Turth-Love ； The self of Love ； Intersubjectirity ； Training each other

參考文獻

(2003)。存在感與歷史感。台北:臺灣商務印書館。

力行要覽編輯社編輯(1933)。王陽明年譜‧三十七歲。台北:力行要覽出版社。

朱熹(1998)。四書章句集註。台北:鵝湖出版社。

朱熹(1998)。四書章句集註。台北:鵝湖出版社。

朱熹(1998)。四書章句集註。台北:鵝湖出版社。