本研究之目的在發展一份評量國小班級創造氣氛量表,並考驗其信、效度。本研究所發展的「班級創造氣氣量表」(CCCI)原有90個題目,經因素分析及試題分析後,刪除19個題目,保留71個題目。 本量表之建構效度由二方面進行考驗:(1)分析本量表之因素結構是否與相關理論及研究結果一致,以檢驗其內容效度;(2)以學生在本研究者所發展的「社會科創造性問題解決測驗」中分測驗(二)之分數作為效標,考驗本量表中各分量表之預測效度。本量表之信度則依據因素分析所構成的因子,進行各因子之內部一致性信度考驗。 本研究以台南市三所國小三年級十四個班級457名學生為樣本,進因素分析,預測效考驗、及內部一致性信度考驗,其結果如下: 1.本量表因素分析結果,獲得三個因素:(1)封閉;(2)開放;(3)個別化。其解釋的變異量分別為:11.7%、8.6%、2.3%。其因素結構與相關理論及研究之結果一致,故其內容效度頗佳。 2.「封閉」之班級氣氛與學生在「社會科創造性問題解決測驗」之流暢性及變通性分數有顯著的負相關,「開放」之班級氣氣與學生在「社會科創造性問題解決測驗」之流暢性、變通性有顯著的正相關,由此可知,本量表之預測效度頗佳。 3.本量表三個因素之內部一致性信度(Cronback α)係數分別為.87, .85, .67,由此可知,本量表三個分量表之內部一致性信度頗佳。
The purposes of this study were to develop a creative classroom climate inventory and to explore the validity of this inventory. Ninety items for the ”Creative Classroom Climate Inventory” (CCCI) were created by the researcher. The CCCI and the Creative Problem Solving Test in Social Study (CPST) were conducted to 457 third grader in Tainan City. The results indicated: 1. The CCCI consisted of 3 factors: (1) closed; (2) open; (3) individualized instruction. They separately contributed 11.7%, 8.6%, 5.53%, and 2.37%, of total variance of the CCCI. The factors structure of the CCCI was consistent with related researches. Therefore, the content validity of CCCI was accepted. 2. Closed classroom climate was significantly and negatively correlated with scores of fluency and flexibility in CPST and open classroom climate was significantly and positively correlated with scores of fluency and flexibility in CPST. Therefore, the predictive validity of CCCI was retained. 3. The internal consistency coefficients of the three subscales of the CCCI were .87, .85, and .67. Therefore, the reliability of the CCCI was supported.