無記名票據背書連續性之探討

Discussion of the Endorsement Continuity of the Bearer Bill

洪大安(Ta-An Hung)

《稻江學報》 4卷2期 (2010/03) Pp. 225-233

https://doi.org/10.7018/JTU.201003.0225

摘要

按我國票據法之規定，執票人應以背書之連續，證明其權利，且付款人對於背書不連續之票據而付款者，應自負其責。
所謂背書連續係指自受款人至最後背書人之執票人，形式上均相連續無間斷者，而判斷票據是否有背書連續性，祇須依票據背面之記載，各背書具有同一性且形式上得以判斷其連續即可。
但當背書人不依背書欄之順序背書時，背書連續之效力又如何認定？又無記名票據並無受款人之記載，據此，將生無記名票據是否有背書連續以及如何判斷背書連續之疑義。
本文以案例式探討我國票據法上票據轉讓之方式、票據背書連續之判斷以及無記名票據是否有背書連續之適用，從我國票據法之規定，與最高法院之判決與決議，針對本文案例提出之問題，加以陳述說明。

關鍵字

無記名票據 ； 背書 ； 背書連續 ； 追索權

並列摘要

According to the regulation of the Negotiable Instruments Law of our country, the bearer should endorse continuously, proves its right, and the drawee regarding endorses bill not the continuously but the drawee, should take responsibility for oneself.
So-called endorses is continuously refers to bearer of from the payee to the final endorser, formally homogeneous phase continuously not interrupted, but judges the bill whether to have endorses the continuity, must depend on at the back of the bill the record, endorses respectively has the identity, and formally can judge it continuously then.
But the bearer bill and does not have record of the payee, according to the above, will live the bearer bill whether to have endorses continuously as well as how to judge endorses the doubt continuously.
This article discusses in our country Negotiable Instruments Law by the case type way, the bill the bill transfer to endorse the judgment as well as the bearer bill continuously whether to have endorses being suitable continuously, stipulation of from our country Negotiable Instruments Law, decision and the resolution with the Supreme court, asks the question in view of this article case, states the explanation.

並列關鍵字

The bearer bill ； endorse ； endorse continuously ； the recourse