透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.171.180
  • 期刊

歐體法院初步裁決制度淺論

The Preliminary Ruling of the European Court of Justice

摘要


歐洲整合由於涉及到諸多會員國法律體系,爲避免歐洲共同體法與各會員國之內國法產生不一致之情形,故創始條約就歐洲共同體法與會員國之內國法設有一調和制度,即初步裁決制度。倘若會員國法與歐洲共同體法有不相一致之情形,會員國法院或法庭則依據歐洲共同體條約第234條向歐洲共同體法院提請裁決。本文謹就此一制度做一概要之說明與分析。

並列摘要


European integration as it involves many Member States to the legal system, in order to avoid European Community law and Member States within the state laws have inconsistencies in the case. Therefore, founding Treaty on European Community law and the Member States of state laws has a harmonic system, that is preliminary ruling system. If the law of Member States and the European Community is not in line with the situation, the Member States pursuant to a court or tribunal, the European Community Treaty Article 234 to the European Community brought to the court ruling. This paper would like to do on this system on a summary of minutes.

參考文獻


Devuyst, Youri著、門鏡譯(2007)。歐洲一體化進程-歐盟的決策與對外關係。北京:中國人民大學。
王千華(2005)。論歐洲法院的司法能動性。北京:北京大學。
王世洲(2000)。歐洲共同體法律的制定與執行。北京:法律。
王玉葉、沈玄池、洪德欽編(1998)。歐洲聯跟:理論與政策。台北:中研院歐美所。
王玉葉、黃偉峰編(2003)。歐洲聯跟的組織與運作。台北:五南。

被引用紀錄


彭杰(2014)。台灣半導體相關產業在美國量化寬鬆貨幣政策期間之經營績效非線性探討〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.01185
戴家旭(2013)。跨國銷售勞務加值稅課稅權之歸屬〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.00899

延伸閱讀