透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.160.156
  • 期刊

教師主動性人格增進其建言行為!由特質活化理論檢視知覺學校組織支持的潛在調節效果

Proactive Personality Improve Voice Behavior Survey the Perceived Organizational Support of School Latent Moderating Effects by Trait Activation Theory

摘要


教師的意見表達行為對學校發展而言是重要的助力,當學校遇到問題時,若教師能夠積極的提出解決意見,即能使學校改善及進步,由此可見建言行為對學校組織而言是珍貴及重要的力量。而在組織當中,能夠有支持員工的環境,將能提升員工表現出有利組織的行為發生。本研究探討教師主動性人格對建言行為的影響,並且基於特質活化理論,以知覺學校組織支持是否具潛在調節效果加以探討。以國小教師為研究對象,採取分層抽樣方式共發出400份問卷,有效回收問卷375份,問卷分析結果顯示:1.當教師主動性人格越強時,將越容易表現出建言行為。2.當學校教師知覺學校組織支持的程度越高,越容易表現出建言行為。3.教師知覺學校組織支持的確能強化主動性人格教師對建言行為的效果。本研究透過分析與探討,期望未來在教育現場能更正視教師之意見表達行為,如學校單位給予正向支持,且在重要的委員會團體組織能聘僱主動性人格之教師擔任委員,使學校組織能有長遠的進步與發展。

並列摘要


The teacher's opinion expression behavior towards school is deeply meaningful to the development of the school. If a teacher actively put forward an opinion for the solution to school when the school encounters a problem, it's expected that school may review and improve. This shows that voice behavior is a valuable and important power of the school organizations. And in the organization which can support the staff of the environment, will be able to enhance the performance of employees to show the behavior favorable for organizations. This study aims at teacher's proactive personality, voice behavior and perceived supervisor support for exploration, and access latent moderating effects of perceived organizational support and proactive personality on voice behavior by utilizing the trait activation theory. This study use questionnaire as study method, questionnaires were handed out to 400 teachers by stratified sampling, while 375 samples were valid, with hierarchical regression analysis, the results are listed as follows. First, the higher of the proactive personality, the higher of voice behavior. Second, the higher of teacher's perceived organizational support, the higher of voice behavior. Third, perceived organizational support are the moderator variable that are positively correlated with voice behavior.

參考文獻


Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118. doi:10.1002/job.4030140202
Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(6), 1214-1221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1214
Detert, J., & Burris, E. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really ppen. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4),869-884. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
Edmonson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.doi: 10.13072/midss.111

延伸閱讀