透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.47.33

並列摘要


Economic analysis is a critical component of a comprehensive project or program evaluation methodology that considers all key quantitative and qualitative impacts of highway investments. It allows highway agencies to identify, quantify, and value the economic benefits and costs of highway projects and programs over a multiyear timeframe. This research was conducted to provide the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) with a uniform economic analysis methodology. The developed economic evaluation model applies the methodology of life-cycle benefit cost analysis to perform economic analysis for proposed highway projects. As a result of this research, an Excel based computer program, the Indiana Highway Economic Evaluation Model (IHEEM), was developed to provide a convenient tool for INDOT personnel to implement the method. A probabilistic model was developed in IHEEM to provide an alternative option for economic analysis in addition to the deterministic model described in the previous chapters. Users of IHEEM can choose either one or both of deterministic and probabilistic methods in economic analysis of highway and bridge improvement projects. In the model, traffic volume and construction cost are treated as random variables with certain statistic characteristics. In the probabilistic process, the random variable is assigned to an appropriate distribution with an estimated coefficient of variance (CV). A simulation process is repeated for a user defined number of times by random numbers to generate an output with statistic ranges and confidence levels.

參考文獻


Tighe, S. (2001). Guidelines for Probabilistic Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis. Transportation Research Record, No. 1769, pp. 28-38.
Reigle, J.A. and Zaniewski, J.P. (2005). Risk-based life-cycle cost analysis for project-level pavement management. Transportation Research Record, No. 1816, pp. 34-42.
Li, Z. and Madanu, S. (2009). Highway project level life-cycle benefit/cost analysis under certainty, risk, and uncertainty: methodology with case study. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135(8), pp. 516-526.
Federal Highway Administration (1998). Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design, In search of better investment decisions, Publication No. FHWA-SA-98-079. Office of Engineering, Washington DC, USA.
Setunge, S., Kumar, A., Nezamian, A., De Sliva, S., and Lokuge, W., Carse, A., Spathonis, J., Chandler, L., Gilbert, D.; Johnson, B.; Jeary, A.; and Pham, L. (2005). Whole of life cycle cost analysis in bridge rehabilitation. Report 2002-005-C-03. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

被引用紀錄


謝長潤(2016)。國道三號大溪龍潭段剛柔性鋪面生命週期成本分析與碳排放量比較〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603216
李寧(2016)。鋪面整修工程之節費與減碳對策〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602029

延伸閱讀