透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.193.129
  • 期刊

原住民持有槍械問題之研究

On the Issue of the Possession of Firearms by Taiwanese Aborigines

摘要


近年來,臺灣社會逐漸開始重視島嶼內多元文化的議題。而原、漢文化與價值觀的差異性,亦影響著近年來的修法活動。對原住民狩獵權影響較為深遠的《槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例》,雖然例外允許原住民可以自製獵槍或持有自製獵槍。然而實際上,仍不時出現原住民持有獵槍而受到處罰的案例。原住民被處罰的原因,常圍繞在法律條文所使用的字詞定義之解釋,例如原住民所持有的槍是不是「自製獵槍」?持有獵槍是不是為了「供作生活工具之用」?然而這些法律文義解釋的爭議,背後往往隱藏著漢人司法人員在適用法律時,不瞭解原住民狩獵權的意義,因此傾向於對原住民被告行為進行嚴格的審查。此外,可以免除刑罰的被告以具有原住民身分者為限,但是原住民身分的認定一直就是個相當具爭議性的議題,而且特殊案例層出不窮。本論文即以上述法律解釋之爭議作為出發點,以實證統計分析為方法,探討原住民持有槍械的法律規定與檢驗我國原住民族權在司法領域中的實踐情況。

並列摘要


As Taiwanese society has gradually raised its awareness of multicultural issues in recent years, the differences in terms of cultures and values between Han (Mandarin-speaking) people and indigenous people have been highlighted in recent legal revisions. Take, for example, The Act Governing the Control and Prohibition of Guns, Cannons, Ammunition and Knives, which directly impacts Taiwanese aborigines. Although the Act makes an exception to allow for indigenous people to produce or possess hunting firearms, in reality, aborigines still run afoul of this law from time to time. Some aborigines have been penalized because their firearms did not meet the legal requirements for ”self-made hunting firearms,” while others have been punished because their firearms did not serve ”the purpose of earning a livelihood.” In addition, the Act decriminalizes only defendants acknowledged as aborigines, but the question of how to identify one's indigenous status is quite a controversial topic in and of itself, not to mention the probability of an endless number of exceptional cases of indigenous identity. This study aims to reflect on the issue of aboriginal people's possession of firearms by elaborating on controversies related to the legal interpretations mentioned above.

參考文獻


王皇玉(2007)。文化衝突與臺灣原住民犯罪困境之探討。台大法學論叢。36(3),255-304。
王皇玉(2009)。刑罰與社會規訓。台北:元照。
王皇玉()。
王泰升(2004)。台灣法律史概論。台北:元照。
立法院(編)。1984。《槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例案,法律案專輯第59 輯》。台北:立法院

被引用紀錄


張永政(2018)。論制度缺失下的期待可能性〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800208
何書雅(2015)。文化抗辯及其理論實踐於我國刑事判決之適用-以原住民為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.01264
林禹宏(2014)。原住民被告於刑事程序之困境與解決〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00362
李明芝(2013)。原住民採取森林產物的文化困境與除罪化研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01520
范耕維(2021)。污名或正義?:原住民被告受辯護人協助權利內涵及制度設計之檢討臺大法學論叢50(3),927-992。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202109_50(3).0004

延伸閱讀