透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.141.200.180
  • 期刊

綜合性概念指標建構之初探

An Introduction to the Construction of Composite Indicators

摘要


綜合指標已逐漸被各國所應用爲一種政策工具;它不但能以簡化的指標反映現況之複雜性,更能掌握潛在問題與趨勢發展。然而,綜合指標的建構並不容易,方法上的挑戰也可能產生一連串的技術問題,如果問題無法充分獲得解決,可能導致綜合指標被錯誤的解釋及操縱,因此,指標的建構與合理的使用極爲重要。本文之主要目的爲說明及介紹綜合指標之概念、應用以及建構之要點。本研究旨在透過有系統的方式,基於過去研究及相關理論,整理建構評估指標的方式,提供發展適當綜合指標建構方法,並有助於釐清概念與協助建構績效評估機制。本文共計爲五個章節:首先,緒論將簡介綜合指標之定義與種類;第二章說明研究動機與目的;第三章闡明研究方法,介紹建構綜合指標應遵循之建議步驟;第四章說明綜合指標之發展與應用;最後一張則爲結論。

並列摘要


Composite indicator has gradually been adopted by countries as a policy tool. It is not only to simplify indicators to reflect the full complexity of the current situation, but to grasp the potential problems and trends as well. However, the construction of composite indicator might produce a series of technical problems and if problems could not be addressed adequately, composite indicators could lead to wrong interpretation and manipulation. As a result, the construction of indicators and reasonable use are extremely important. This paper aims to provide a systematic description, based on previous studies and related theories. It manages construction of evaluation indicators, provides comprehensive development of appropriate indicators of construction methods, and helps to clarify the concept and to establish a performance evaluation mechanism. There are five sections of this paper: firstly, the introduction introduces the definition and types of composite indicators; the next section explains the motivation and purpose of this paper; the third section explains the mythology, and highlights the recommended steps that the construction of composite indicators should follow; the fourth section shows the development and application of composite indicator and the last section is the conclusion.

並列關鍵字

無資料

參考文獻


Booysen, F.(2002).An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development.Social Indicator Research.59,115-151.
Cherchye, L.,Moesen, W.,Rogge, N.,Puyenbroeck, T.,Saisana, M.,Saltelli, A.,Liska, R.,Tarantola, S.(2008).Journal of the Operational Research Society.59,239-251.
Cox D.,Fitzpatrick, R.,Fletcher, A.,Gore S.,Spiegelhalter D.,Jones, D.(1992).Quality-of-life assessment: Can we keep it simple?.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.155(3),353-393.
Cribari-Neto, F.,Jensen M. J.,Novo A.(1999).Research in econometric theory: Quantitative and qualitative productivity rankings.Econometric Theory.15(5),719-752.
Ebert, U.,Welsch, H.(2004).Meaningful environmental indices: A social choice approach.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.47,270-283.

被引用紀錄


陳召宜(2013)。臺灣綠色成長指標建置之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1108201323175900

延伸閱讀