透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.19.251
  • 期刊

社會工作領域中訓練發展程序公平、專業承諾與積極出勤之研究-調節焦點的中介型干擾角色

The Study of Training and Development Procedural Justice, Professional Commitment and Presenteeism in Social Work Field: Regulatory Focus as a Mediated Moderator

摘要


本研究旨在探討訓練發展程序公平、專業承諾、積極出勤以及調節焦點的關係。本研究以社會工作者為研究母群,採取立意取樣方式進行。共發放問卷667份,實際回收有效問卷415份,回收率為62.2%。回收之有效問卷,採用描述性統計與階層迴歸等統計方法進行資料分析。根據實證分析結果,獲致主要結果如下:一、訓練發展程序公平分別與積極出勤、專業承諾存有正向關係。二、專業承諾對訓練發展程序公平與積極出勤具有部分中介效果。三、調節焦點分別對訓練發展程序公平與積極出勤、專業承諾具有干擾效果。四、調節焦點與訓練發展程序公平之交互作用會透過專業承諾而影響積極出勤。最後,本研究依研究結果針對實務界提出具體的管理意涵,並提供後續研究者未來研究的參考方向。

並列摘要


Extant literature indicates presenteeism harms the organization but few studies investigate the individuals' underlying motives toward presenteeism, especially for those professional workers who face a wide range of difficulties and challenges in their daily work (e.g., social workers). Improving their professional ability through a fair training and development program becomes a critical issue. Present study examines the role of professional commitment in the relationship between training and development procedural justice and presenteeism and tests whether this relationship is further moderated by different regulatory focus (mediated moderation). Present study assessed the relationships among training and development procedural justice, professional commitment, presenteeism and regulator focus. A total 667 social workers were sampled and resulted in 415 valid surveys with a valid return rate of 62.2%. Results of hierarchical multiple regressions revealed: 1. training and development procedural justice was positive related to presenteeism and professional commitment; 2. professional commitment partial mediated the relationship between training and development procedural justice and presenteeism; 3. regulatory focus moderated the relationships between training and development procedural justice and presenteeism and between training and development procedural justice and professional commitment; 4. the effect of interaction of training and development procedural justice and regulatory focus on presenteeism was mediated by professional commitment. Implication for practice and further research are discussed.

參考文獻


彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試與補救。管理學報。23(1),77-98。
張火燦、劉淑寧(2007)。人力資源領先指標對研發人員敬業貢獻之影響:中介模式的測試。人力資源管理學報。7(3),1-24。
張保隆、鄭妃君(2008)。訓練與發展程序公平量表之發展。臺大管理論叢。18(2),79-104。
曾信超、李元墩、康榮民(2008)。轉換型領導、工作滿足與組織承諾關係之研究:以調節焦點為中介變數。企業管理學報。78,84-121。
顏志龍(2009)。死亡威脅下訊息參照架構對說服之影響:調控焦點的調節效果。中華心理學刊。51(2),235-250。

被引用紀錄


林惠彥(2013)。初探勉強出勤之相關因素〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.02697
吳國鳯(2014)。個人績效評估與時序變動之動態資料包絡分析: 人力資本效率模型的模式發展與實證分析〔博士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201511570412

延伸閱讀