「成果導向學習」與大學教學的品質提升：以中文學科的實踐為例

Outcome-Based Learning and the Quality Enhancement of University Teaching: The Practices of Chinese Teachers

梁佩雲(Pamela Pui-Wan Leung)

《教育科學研究期刊》 58卷4期 (2013/12) Pp. 1-35

https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).01

摘要

「成果導向學習」是源自西方的教育理念，在中文學科實施的先例並不多見；要同一學系內全體教師參與先導實踐，更不是易事。為此，本研究報告的是一所香港高等院校中文學科的教學實踐經驗。通過對照修訂前後的科目教學大綱，輔以師生對教學嘗試的迴響，本研究採用質量並重的內容分析法，剖析「成果導向學習」對提升教學素質的作用。研究發現：「成果導向學習」強調落實學習成果、教學活動與評估的緊密聯繫，較傳統的教學模式更能為學生提供優質學習經驗。要維持優質課程，辦學機構必須支援教師的持續專業發展，並注意在追求素質保證與教師自主之間取得平衡；而教師則要不斷反思，調節教學安排，力求貫通課程各層面的預期學習成果，以訂定適量而有效的評估設計。

關鍵字

大學教學 ； 成果導向學習 ； 多元評估 ； 建設性調準 ； 學習成果

並列摘要

”Outcome-based learning” (OBL) is a western approach to education and has not been widely adopted in Chinese teaching practices. Few precedents of Chinese OBL programs have been found in the literature and engaging entire teaching staff in the same department for piloting this approach is difficult. Therefore, this study describes how a higher education institution in Hong Kong promoted OBL to Chinese students. We compared pre- and post-revision course outlines and feedback obtained from teachers and students in the experiment and adopted qualitative and quantitative content analysis methods to examine the effects of OBL on enhancing teaching quality. The findings indicated that the influence of OBL on the close alignment of learning outcomes, teaching activities, and assessments has facilitated improved student learning experiences more than traditional teaching approaches have. To sustain a quality OBL program, institutions should support the ongoing professional development of teachers and maintain a balance between quality assurance and teacher autonomy. In addition, teachers should consider their daily practices, adjust various teaching arrangements, ensure that expected learning outcomes based on various program aspects are aligned, and establish appropriate and effective assessments.

並列關鍵字

university teaching ； outcome-based learning ； multiple assessments ； constructive alignment ； learning outcomes

參考文獻

黃源河、符碧真（2011）。揭開日本學生接觸表現背後的秘密：教學研究。教育科學研究期刊， 56（4），69-97。doi:10.3966/2073753X2011125604003 【Hwang, Y.-R., & Fwu, B.-J. (2011). The most significant factor underlying Japanese students’ academic success: Lesson study. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(4), 69-97. doi:10.3966/2073753X20111256 04003】

吳清山、蔡菁芝（2006）。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示。師大學報：教育類， 51（1），1-21。doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001 【Wu, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). A comparative analysis of educational accountability in the UK and USA. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 51(1), 1-21. doi:10.3966/2073753X2006045101001】

Berlach, G. R., & O'Neill, M. (2008). Western Australia's ‘English' course of study: To OBE or not to OBE, perhaps that is the question. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 49-62. doi:10. 1177/000494410805200104

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. doi:10.1007/BF00138871

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Oxford University Press.